Stone Sack.

[Lylyth]

You're using a sling either if:
You're a noob
Your bow or MM isn't good
You're hunting small animals

After getting 150+ MM and a good bow, I hunted everything with it, I didn't even used a quiver since the 4 arrows I carried did enough to be able to shoot at best, 2 bears. If I needed more arrows, I could just go into the nearby tree and boulder and make stone arrows.

Oh yeah, NO about the Stone sack.

You're using a bow either if:
You're a noob (it's joke i like bow)
Your sling or MM isn't good
You're breaking human stuff

After getting 320+ MM and 160+ sling, you one shoot dear with it, with 5 stone you can kill bear , if you need stone just take it on boulder; AND you can have one Travelers bag; and backpack.

Oh yeah, Yes about using the Stone sack; it'will be good for statues not for hunting.

[factnfiction101]

I'm not sure you know how the bow or sling works in regards to MM

[jesi]

[quote="hazzor"]
it's this issue of people mistaking convenience for laziness or "casual" gameplay, . . . there is no reason why not to have sacks . . .

Am I the only one who thinks that, for a girl, a serious discussion of stone sacks is an oxymoron.

[TeckXKnight]

Am I the only one who thinks that, for a girl, a serious discussion of stone sacks is an oxymoron.

Yes. Now stop being a moron.

[Kkkey]

Why not just have a stone sack that holds 100 stones, and consumes both hands?
Then sling users wouldn't be able to use it, but pavers and roadbuilders (even mansion builders) would.

[Kriegwolf]

The idea was to use the sack for slings only, dammit

[ApocalypsePlease]

The idea was to use the sack for slings only, dammit

And yet still nobody has responded to the point against a sack for slings I've made.

[DragonScythe]

remove slings, they can work as high quality stone transportation.

[Kubius]

I'd be cool with this if you have to hold the sack to fill it.