-
ewlol
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
who is jordancoles?
-
jordancoles
- Posts: 14168
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
I'm Squealer.ewlol wrote:who is jordancoles?
Check out my pro-tips threadDuhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.

-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
ewlol wrote:who is jordancoles?
No one of consequence....
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
Anon9k
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
Sir, that can't be fatter much more. Yeah, 7 warriors were so afraid of MASTERGOD OF PVP (don't forget 10 buckets of water in his inv, lol) so they just dropped their gear and ran away. Very possible. yeah. Cut the crap please.bmjclark wrote: Also, technically this only became a 7v1 because his friends were to scared to stay and help him.
-
Aracos
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:47 am
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
You mean like in AFo battle when 2 guys scaped while his mates were beeing chased and killed?bmjclark wrote: Also, technically this only became a 7v1 because his friends were to scared to stay and help him.

Winter is coming...
-
bmjclark
- Posts: 4053
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
Sort of like u did at the WoR fight?Aracos wrote:You mean like in AFo battle when 2 guys scaped while his mates were beeing chased and killed?bmjclark wrote: Also, technically this only became a 7v1 because his friends were to scared to stay and help him.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
-
painhertz
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:07 am
- Website: Http://www.noneyafuckinbusyness.com
- Yahoo Messenger: chaosovum
- Location: Louisiana
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
I really wish you people would stop with the he said/she said and get with more of the killing of each other. i assure you that not a single post in this entire thread is going to sway forum opinion to either of your sides and I'd bet that the majority of Haven players just wish that you would wipe each other out and STFU already.....
"I shall PERSONALLY witness for you at the shiny, chrome gates of Valhalla!"
-
BadMotel
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:33 am
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
You're telling me two people on the internet both calling each other "Idiot pussy bitches, just like battle XXX" isn't going to make me like them more!!!!!
:mind=blown:
So yeah, MORE KILLING!
:mind=blown:
So yeah, MORE KILLING!
Today is a good day to die.
-
Anon9k
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
Thank you for such positive response, sir.painhertz wrote:I really wish you people would stop with the he said/she said and get with more of the killing of each other. i assure you that not a single post in this entire thread is going to sway forum opinion to either of your sides and I'd bet that the majority of Haven players just wish that you would wipe each other out and STFU already.....
-
jesi
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:18 pm
- Location: Nowhere now
Re: Ainran still burning -Ram left to die, one more WF dirtn
Me, I just like all the machismo.
[quote="hazzor"]
it's this issue of people mistaking convenience for laziness or "casual" gameplay, . . . there is no reason why not to have sacks . . .
it's this issue of people mistaking convenience for laziness or "casual" gameplay, . . . there is no reason why not to have sacks . . .