fallout wrote:Great discussion yourself. .Burinn wrote:
Please stop.
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
fallout wrote:Great discussion yourself. .Burinn wrote:
Please stop.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Sorry, I didn't know it was this bad that you couldn't find the difference of probability based off the number you set previously (1 in 302,600,000)Burinn wrote:
~40% is not slightly off. You got accused of exaggerating and double downed on it. Then proved the accusations correct. It's a million fewer tiles lol.
What a fucking surprise that is. Please use accurate numbers instead of pulling them out of your ass and maybe people won't feel so strongly that you're making things up!
Holy fuck you actually don't know what a percentage is.loleznub wrote:Sorry, I didn't know it was this bad that you couldn't find the difference of probability based off the number you set previously (1 in 302,600,000)Burinn wrote:
~40% is not slightly off. You got accused of exaggerating and double downed on it. Then proved the accusations correct. It's a million fewer tiles lol.
What a fucking surprise that is. Please use accurate numbers instead of pulling them out of your ass and maybe people won't feel so strongly that you're making things up!
2,250,000-1,125,000= 1,125,000
1,125,000/302,600,000 = .0037 (or .37%)
compared to
2,250,000/302,600,000 = .0074 (or .74%)
Such, a difference of ~.4% from the original claim, based off your own saying of what happened to me is the same as me winning the lottery!
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
If you want the map markers file, I can send them to you in a PM so you may upload them yourself to verify it's not Photoshopped but indeed part of the Time Paradox Map Tool that is in the modding section of the forum. I've got no reason to lie here.xdragonlord18 wrote:Lmao can you stop making Burinn look good? Please? They just said that any map you post is going to be easily fabricated. Then you posted a map that is easy to fabricate. I don't know what year you think it is, but it's 2020 and photo editing software has been powerful enough to copy and paste the same icon with different text over and over again on a black background for at least 2 decades.loleznub wrote:Considering those that were vehemently opposing me have now gone silent after viewing my reply, there you have it folks turns out the experienced player was correct in the end and a sprucecap that was acting high and mighty was indeed wrong.
Can you address this please?Burinn wrote:
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
I'm not calculating the difference my original claim was off to my own, but rather the difference based on your claim of what was happening was the same as 1/302,600,000 (i.e winning the lottery)Burinn wrote:
Holy fuck you actually don't know what a percentage is.
Please address the fact that you lied and have now had us talk about a situation that does not in fact exist for 4 pages.loleznub wrote:I'm not calculating the difference my original claim was off to my own, but rather the difference based on your claim of what was happening was the same as 1/302,600,000 (i.e winning the lottery)Burinn wrote:
Holy fuck you actually don't know what a percentage is.
If you can't see this, it's pretty sad.
You're trying to compare me saying I had 2 oranges when in actuality I only had 1.
I'm trying to compare your claim, and the difference in my claim to the realistic one, and that difference is very small.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Your inability to read is astonishing, like I said previously, I was not at home and therefore did not have the map in front of me. I knew it was a large area, so I guestimated (15x15 compared to 12x10 is not that large of a difference in the overarching arguement) The map I gave you as proof is still over a million tiles prospected, which should serve as more than enough to reinforce the claim.Burinn wrote:Can you address this please?Burinn wrote:
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
If you have no reason to lie, why the fuck did you lie about how much you searched in the first place? Come on dude.
It's like talking to a handicapped brick wall, I truly pity you. Must be a pretty sad lifeBurinn wrote:
Please address the fact that you lied and have now had us talk about a situation that does not in fact exist for 4 pages.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off