sabinati wrote:
the difference here is that you were helping misrepresent the identity of the trader. pande trade topic is named "pandemonium trades", in w3 AD thread was named "AD trades", goon thread was named "goon trades", etc. honesty is imporant in trade, and you guys are being dishonest, and it's DIRTY. and i don't like dirty things in politics or trade. it's laughable that you're trying to guilt trip ME here.
As for me. I didn't want to accuse LadyGoo personally of killing her customers. Maybe she has broken with Voedoos tradition here, who knows. Which bothers me is Headshots comment passing this thread off as something it is not. Which clearly shows to me that they have something to hide. I mean come on LadyGoo says she didn't use her main account because she was afraid to get a bad reputation (which is probably even more ironic) and then gets Headshot to post a false statement as a reputation saver...that is so ironic and also so wrong. Why would you have to fake statements if your trading thread was so clean?
burgingham wrote:
As for me. I didn't want to accuse LadyGoo personally of killing her customers. Maybe she has broken with Voedoos tradition here, who knows. Which bothers me is Headshots comment passing this thread off as something it is not. Which clearly shows to me that they have something to hide.
Everyone have something to hide, actually. Even you.
For example i dont want to reveal my village, for security reasons. I invite my customers to the trading post, we trade - no problem.
I mean come on LadyGoo says she didn't use her main account because she was afraid to get a bad reputation (which is probably even more ironic) and then gets Headshot to post a false statement as a reputation saver...that is so ironic and also so wrong. Why would you have to fake statements if your trading thread was so clean?
What statement? Show me a single false statement in his post.
There's only two things that i can really say about this:
1) Your credentials are of your previous history, background, characteristic, as well as your allegiance. For example, if you are dealing with Aso from world 3 Lost Cavern, you are most likely guarantee that his trade is genuine as he has a history and credential already established. In contrast, if you are dealing with me, you are not as secure as I am some guy with a low post count and (supposedly) unknown affiliations, and no I am not a trader.
2) Use some secure method of security to ensure that you will not be raided. In general you should use a temporary trading post anyways to avoid the mole item trick. This is a loose example but Constantinople was a semi-secure area because they enforced a no-politics region.
PS: As for my opinion about "RUA" and Pandemonium, I don't care either way.
An enemy will only fight if he believes he either has a chance to win, or you've backed him into a corner and he's fighting for his life. A completely crushing victory provides an enemy with neither.
sabinati wrote:
the difference here is that you were helping misrepresent the identity of the trader. pande trade topic is named "pandemonium trades", in w3 AD thread was named "AD trades", goon thread was named "goon trades", etc. honesty is imporant in trade, and you guys are being dishonest, and it's DIRTY. and i don't like dirty things in politics or trade. it's laughable that you're trying to guilt trip ME here.
You mad, bro
why would i be mad? i have no economic or political investment here.
RUA claiming innocence and complaining about mod interference is such an insult to a random observer's intelligence (specifically, they seem to regularly underestimate our reading comprehension) that it pits me against them far more than getting killed or raided in game ever would.
