The Reformation of Wayneville

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:59 pm

How's this for a spin? If they start....what did you call it? "non-consensual abusive..." PK, over half the constituents would take objection and the city would lose it's cohesion and possibly even security depending on how gross the actions and objection.

Wow, what a major tl;dr fucking butthurt. THe mofo must have had 2mo old nub raped by one of the former PKers.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:08 pm

Spider wrote:Jorb and Loftar told them to knock it off;

Wow. What a fucking moron. Not only have J&L commited to not policing the player base beyond major bug abuse but they wouldn't. Bugged or noot WV actions provided a lot fo valuable playtesting of various largely untested features.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Spider » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:47 pm

Chakravanti wrote:
Spider wrote:Jorb and Loftar told them to knock it off;

Wow. What a fucking moron. Not only have J&L commited to not policing the player base beyond major bug abuse but they wouldn't. Bugged or noot WV actions provided a lot fo valuable playtesting of various largely untested features.


I think you misunderstand, Chak. I wasn't suggesting this was the truth, only that it was the kind of answer I was looking for. It's not possible that the whole list of suggestions I made could be true. Some of them were contradictory.

I can imagine J & L telling Wayneville to knock it off, but only if they concluded that their actions had resulted in a complete stop in new members and the loss of many old members. Even then they would be far, far more likely to come up with some kind of a fix. I'm well aware of their hands off policy. And as we know from the recent number of players on line Wayneville's aggression has clearly not stopped new member from joining!
Spider
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:30 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Jackard » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:53 pm

Chakravanti wrote:
Spider wrote:Jorb and Loftar told them to knock it off;

Wow. What a fucking moron. Not only have J&L commited to not policing the player base beyond major bug abuse but they wouldn't. Bugged or noot WV actions provided a lot fo valuable playtesting of various largely untested features.

and lets not forget that jorb has participated in raids in the past. iirc he is somewhat of a pvp enthusiast
“A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby warrri » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:58 pm

And loftar watched the macomb raid :D
The world I love The tears I drop To be part of The wave can't stop
Ever wonder if it's all for you
The world I love The trains I hop To be part of The wave can't stop
Come and tell me when it's time to
User avatar
warrri
 
Posts: 1033
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:55 pm

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby burgingham » Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:59 pm

jorb wrote:Haha, indeed. Why don't you guys go in there and rape them again? :)


Jorbs answer to me saying Russians might become too strong for wv to handle.
User avatar
burgingham
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Spider » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:03 am

Chakravanti wrote:How's this for a spin? If they start....what did you call it? "non-consensual abusive..." PK, over half the constituents would take objection and the city would lose it's cohesion and possibly even security depending on how gross the actions and objection.

Wow, what a major tl;dr fucking butthurt. THe mofo must have had 2mo old nub raped by one of the former PKers.


I don't think I am butthurt. I found being the subject of violence from the Wayneville attack unsettling to be sure, but also very interesting. Normally I withdraw from a situation like that so quickly -being a coward -that I don't get to observe it closely. But once I did my response was to try to understand what was going on and why the people involved did what they did and what they got out of it. I don't play conflict myself, so I am trying to understand the motivations of people who do.

Where I come from any subject is open to debate and I felt my questions had not been adequately answered. I'm afraid I can be a little bit persistent when it comes to arguing a point and I figured that if this frustrated you, you would simply block my posts.

Actually, your spin is informative. Combined with Warri's statement that only four people have been substantially involved with the conconsensual pvp, the suggestion that over half the constitutions would object and it would break up Wayneville is an idea worth pondering.

I don't know what mofo means. Did you just call me a mother fucker?
Spider
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:30 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:04 am

Spider wrote:
Chakravanti wrote:
Spider wrote:Jorb and Loftar told them to knock it off;

Wow. What a fucking moron. Not only have J&L commited to not policing the player base beyond major bug abuse but they wouldn't. Bugged or noot WV actions provided a lot fo valuable playtesting of various largely untested features.


I think you misunderstand, Chak. I wasn't suggesting this was the truth, only that it was the kind of answer I was looking for. It's not possible that the whole list of suggestions I made could be true. Some of them were contradictory.

I don't misunderatand you. It's just that this particular piece was especially fucking moronic regardless of how you extrapolate it.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:07 am

Spider wrote:Where I come from any subject is open to debate and I felt my questions had not been adequately answered. I'm afraid I can be a little bit persistent when it comes to arguing a point and I figured that if this frustrated you, you would simply block my posts.

It might help if your 'questions' were actually questions. Let's get to the REAL point shall we? That being, that Wendy Testaburger killed all the smurfs, or did she? How long can a single smurfberry power the school?
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Spider » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:13 am

Chakravanti wrote:Wow. What a fucking moron. Not only have J&L commited to not policing the player base beyond major bug abuse but they wouldn't. Bugged or noot WV actions provided a lot fo valuable playtesting of various largely untested features.


I think you misunderstand, Chak. I wasn't suggesting this was the truth, only that it was the kind of answer I was looking for. It's not possible that the whole list of suggestions I made could be true. Some of them were contradictory.
[/quote]
I don't misunderatand you. It's just that this particular piece was especially fucking moronic regardless of how you extrapolate it.[/quote]

Would you mind explaining why it was moronic? I'm having trouble figuring out which part of it you object to, if not the sample list of the sort of motivations I'm hoping to get.
Spider
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:30 am

PreviousNext

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests