Chakravanti wrote:How's this for a spin? If they start....what did you call it? "non-consensual abusive..." PK, over half the constituents would take objection and the city would lose it's cohesion and possibly even security depending on how gross the actions and objection.
Wow, what a major tl;dr fucking butthurt. THe mofo must have had 2mo old nub raped by one of the former PKers.
I don't think I am butthurt. I found being the subject of violence from the Wayneville attack unsettling to be sure, but also very interesting. Normally I withdraw from a situation like that so quickly -being a coward -that I don't get to observe it closely. But once I did my response was to try to understand what was going on and why the people involved did what they did and what they got out of it. I don't play conflict myself, so I am trying to understand the motivations of people who do.
Where I come from any subject is open to debate and I felt my questions had not been adequately answered. I'm afraid I can be a little bit persistent when it comes to arguing a point and I figured that if this frustrated you, you would simply block my posts.
Actually, your spin is informative. Combined with Warri's statement that only four people have been substantially involved with the conconsensual pvp, the suggestion that over half the constitutions would object and it would break up Wayneville is an idea worth pondering.
I don't know what mofo means. Did you just call me a mother fucker?