Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby SillyFace » Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:58 pm

yeah i'm around his place now.. Village claim anyone? :P

so much effort to just get a little bit of revenge xD we've been trying to do it for about 2 maybe 3 weeks now :?

Atleast then we could claim over it and he wouldn't be able to move in his own enclosure. :twisted:

Anyone mind if we do that and completly wall it in then just totaly screw him over?
User avatar
SillyFace
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Handofevil » Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:14 pm

Do whatever you want. He's obviously warping to his village and hearthing back. The mine in there is copper so It's impossible that he's acting alone.
NaoWhut wrote:a nice juicy jorb dong.
User avatar
Handofevil
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:46 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby WarpedWiseMan » Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:40 pm

This brings me to a problem I have with this game. It rewards criminal acts too easily. Yes, you might get killed if the person you rob has enough time to make it happen but in most cases its too much trouble.

So there needs to be a change in the revenge mechanics. I'm making a proposal in the Ideas thread.
btaylor wrote:I have learned that the game doesn't follow the principles of mathematics. If you want something and the game is in a good mood you can get it, whatever it is. More often than not, however, the game wants you to die.

-Avatar by SacreDoom

Image
User avatar
WarpedWiseMan
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: A throne.

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby burgingham » Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:31 pm

Guess who was all for basically invincible walls? The people who got raided and griefed in the first place. Now it turns out the buff of walls helped the criminals more than their victims. I am having a problem with this for quite some time, just no good idea on how to keep meaningful defenses, not protect the criminals too much and at the same time not remove PvP and stealing completely from the game.
User avatar
burgingham
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Sotsa » Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:04 pm

burgingham wrote:Guess who was all for basically invincible walls? The people who got raided and griefed in the first place. Now it turns out the buff of walls helped the criminals more than their victims. I am having a problem with this for quite some time, just no good idea on how to keep meaningful defenses, not protect the criminals too much and at the same time not remove PvP and stealing completely from the game.


I do not think it's a problem. It's a game of waiting for someone to do a mistake.
the problem with being a criminal is not so much the danger of doing just one heist, but the danger of keeping it up. sooner or later you will have some sort of reprecussions, and then it's just a matter of who wins.
Better walls benefit both agressors and people who just want to wall off their stuff. human mistake or neglect is what makes walls possible to get through, for both sides.

See this guy puts a lot of effort in denying the rams, the ram guys can just keep making rams and he can just keep walling them in. The difference being that if he succeeds in denying, they can build a new one, but if they succeed in building a ram, he will have lost his stronghold, most likely.
Before you take insult to this post, keep in mind that I am simply a warrior of truth.
User avatar
Sotsa
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:07 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby ElGato » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:03 am

If i get to kill someone, I might help :)
PM~
burgingham wrote:We are all Gato, and Gato is Delamore of course. Goons blablabla...

Caradon wrote:Gato, the anti-ghandi

Sabinati wrote:yeah we're gonna kill you gato!!!
User avatar
ElGato
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:10 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Handofevil » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:22 am

You can do whatever you want. I've given up trying to get our stuff back.
NaoWhut wrote:a nice juicy jorb dong.
User avatar
Handofevil
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:46 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Handofevil » Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:28 am

Alright. We got in. Thanks to some people who won't be named unless they wish to be named. Destroyed everything and took our stuff back.
NaoWhut wrote:a nice juicy jorb dong.
User avatar
Handofevil
 
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:46 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Bismarck » Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:09 am

Post some pictures from when you griefed that guy's place. :D
Bismarck
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:03 am

Re: Thought he was safe. Wrong-o.

Postby Sotsa » Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:58 pm

Bismarck wrote:Post some pictures from when you griefed that guy's place. :D


They didn't 'grief' his place.
Before you take insult to this post, keep in mind that I am simply a warrior of truth.
User avatar
Sotsa
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:07 am

PreviousNext

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests