The Reformation of Wayneville

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby theTrav » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:28 am

Potjeh wrote:OK, you're just trolling now.

Was there ever any doubt?

Spider wrote:Thank you, Chakravanti!
Game. Set. Match.

Well done, you can provoke an extremely volatile personality into threatening your character with in-game violence assuming certain conditions are met. Truly you are a mastermind.

But is there really any evidence that Chak is going to turn violent? What past behaviors heresay and proof are you relying upon to make that statement?


Personally I have been the target of your slanderous rhetoric numerous times in the past, when you said I was going to be violent, when you said I was a sucker and when you said I was some holy beacon of truth and we've all read the forum so I won't recap all that now (even though I just did...) and I know how you could see this as an attack, I really do, but what I really only just want to know if you're still with me listening here now, is that whether there's any reason for me personally, or any player really, who reads these forums. To seriously believe that you have any interest in changing your ways, or for that matter, now that we think of it, coming directly to the point, if you are at all interested in what people actually say and do, so much as, in the other direction, taking one lick with the other, you are perhaps more interested, not to put to fine a point on it, but to strike at the heart of the matter none the less, is that perhaps you prefer to simply inflate the amount of noise made by people responding to your responses, by way of replying and insisting that your response to their response is unsatisfactory. Certainly there's been plenty of repeated evidence in the past that this is the case, and in all seriousness we do understand that it's just a game and this is just a forum but there it is.

I mean, it goes without saying that spider cannot offer a 100% guarantee that he will stop this behaviour, or that he even wants to do such a thing, and obviously I should mention, in case I haven't already made it clear shitting dick nipples, is that there is no pressure or other coersion upon spider to give me such a promise, but if in the case that he did I'm fairly certain that I don't have reason to believe it.

Yes I admit, I am going on with this, and ok, so you probably don't need to read it, and it's probably fairly intrusive but...

Does anyone have any evidence that we should actually be paying any sort of attention to spider at all?
User avatar
theTrav
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Postby Jackard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:48 am

Spider wrote:Game. Set. Match.

Image
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Postby Jackard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:50 am

theTrav wrote:Does anyone have any evidence that we should actually be paying any sort of attention to spider at all?

why did you people even reply when it was obvious what he was up to in the last thread

you are literally incapable of restraint
Last edited by Jackard on Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:53 am

theTrav wrote: we do understand that it's just a game and this is just a forum but there it is.

BLASPHEMY!!! 'Tis srs bznz! En Garde!!!!
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Re:

Postby theTrav » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:00 am

Jackard wrote:why did you people even reply when it was obvious what he was up to in the last thread

Personally I like typing, I was also trying to make funny, I suppose I didn't succeed very well but practice makes perfect.

Jackard wrote:you are literally incapable of restraint

I ignored your antagonism for quite a while, that may not be perfect self control, but it's certainly some evidence of restraint.
User avatar
theTrav
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 11:25 pm

Re:

Postby sabinati » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:07 am

Jackard wrote:
theTrav wrote:Does anyone have any evidence that we should actually be paying any sort of attention to spider at all?

why did you people even reply when it was obvious what he was up to in the last thread

you are literally incapable of restraint


i gotta raise my postcount somehow
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 15513
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Postby Jackard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:13 am

sabinati wrote:i gotta raise my postcount somehow

nah i know why we reply, was just wondering about the others even giving spider the time of day
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:03 am

Sorry Jackard but you major failed on this one. theTrav's post was an epic performance mock that made me laugh till my sides split.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

Postby Jackard » Thu Mar 11, 2010 6:53 am

didnt actually read all of his post. its not bad, but a lot of effort to spend on this idiot

the 'you' was plural, not directed solely at thetrav
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: The Reformation of Wayneville

Postby Chakravanti » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:20 am

Jackard wrote:didnt actually read all of his post. its not bad, but a lot of effort to spend on this idiot

Jackard wrote:nah i know why we reply, was just wondering about the others even giving spider the time of day


The replies aren't necessarily for his benefit. it might be easy to think that...the same way I mistakenly assumed your statment was directed at theTrac despite it's obfuscated generalization.
Well what is this that I can't see
With ice cold hands takin' hold of me
Well I am death, none can excel
-Ralph Stanley, O Death!
User avatar
Chakravanti
 
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am

PreviousNext

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests