[solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Seren_Elder » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:53 pm

shadowchris wrote:Why I get the feeling this is turning into world 2 where people die for no reason lol


yeah
i got killed on saturday

made new account
W3 - Apolion, Terricieil (old & new), Westedge & Saltmummys other place.
W4 - Quahog
W5 - Yggdrasil (now gone) - New Yggdrasil.
User avatar
Seren_Elder
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:59 pm
Location: Down the Street, a block past maple.

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Darwoth55 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 5:55 pm

Avu wrote:Look here dumbfuck perhaps you chose the wrong genre of game to play? This is a game with stats if you don't like stats go fuck yourself on some mmofps shit.



blarg glar glar! i am ANGRRRRRRRYYYY!!!!!

to those previously unable to tell, this is a prime example of butthurtitude
Darwoth55
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Dataslycer » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:00 pm

Darwoth55 wrote:i dont bother with melee combat, that is one of the first things an astute individual would notice about this game

"lol here i go following a guy for 45 minutes because i had to aggro him and generate points first before i could take a swing, tur hur"

the fact that all but one of my accosters were melee dominant goes all the more to show the naive nature of not only those particular players but those who they fight as well, though i guess when 90% of your confrontations are against someones hearthfire it doesnt matter as much :lol:


Nah it only cost me 0 IP to punch your lights out or 3 seconds of aiming with my sling. :)

Btw 2/4 of the people on the screenshot had a ranger bow.
Last edited by Dataslycer on Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you keep focusing on the shadow behind, you will not see the light in front of you.

Being successful isn't just about hard work and succeeding, it is also about picking yourself up when you fail.
User avatar
Dataslycer
 
Posts: 1420
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:06 am

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Avu » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:01 pm

No that is a prime example of Avu; it might be confused with butthurt to neophyte eyes but it's more akin to get off my fucking lawn you dumbass the forum is crowded enough already with retards as it is. You're fucking wasting everyones time and especially mine.
"Since all men count themselves righteous, and since
no righteous man raises his hand against the innocent,
a man need only strike another to make him evil."
User avatar
Avu
 
Posts: 3000
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:00 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Darwoth55 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:10 pm

Dataslycer wrote:
Darwoth55 wrote:i dont bother with melee combat, that is one of the first things an astute individual would notice about this game

"lol here i go following a guy for 45 minutes because i had to aggro him and generate points first before i could take a swing, tur hur"

the fact that all but one of my accosters were melee dominant goes all the more to show the naive nature of not only those particular players but those who they fight as well, though i guess when 90% of your confrontations are against someones hearthfire it doesnt matter as much :lol:


Nah it only cost me 0 IP to punch your lights out or 3 seconds of aiming with my sling. :)

Btw 2/4 of the people on the screenshot had a ranger bow.




is it......... because.......... you.......

HAVE LOTS OF HIGHLY SKILLED STRENGTH STAT!?!?

well color me unimpressed.

and, yeah i said melee dominant due the fact that all but the green caped crusader had swords out the entire time. i guess whoever the other guy was couldnt figure out which weapon he wanted to be ineffectual with and was having a difficult time choosing which fashion accessory to stand around doing nothing with.
Darwoth55
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby spectacle » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:12 pm

Darwoth wouldn't happen to be TheInternetMan returned? There's some similarity to the tone of their posts, and they're both expert trolls of a kind rarely seen...
Once a man has changed the relationship between himself and his environment, he cannot return to the blissful ignorance he left. Motion, of necessity, involves a change in perspective.
-Commissioner Pravin Lal, "A Social History of Planet"
User avatar
spectacle
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:16 am
Location: Planet

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Darwoth55 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:13 pm

Avu wrote:No that is a prime example of Avu; it might be confused with butthurt to neophyte eyes but it's more akin to get off my fucking lawn you dumbass the forum is crowded enough already with retards as it is. You're fucking wasting everyones time and especially mine.



so avu is an angsty teenybopper?
Darwoth55
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Darwoth55 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:14 pm

spectacle wrote:Darwoth wouldn't happen to be TheInternetMan returned? There's some similarity to the tone of their posts, and they're both expert trolls of a kind rarely seen...



no, i am darwoth. son of darwoth2, you killed my father. prepare to die.
Darwoth55
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby burgingham » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:16 pm

spectacle wrote:Darwoth wouldn't happen to be TheInternetMan returned? There's some similarity to the tone of their posts, and they're both expert trolls of a kind rarely seen...


I actually thought the same thing, but it seems there are two guys out there having similar problems.
User avatar
burgingham
 
Posts: 8486
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:58 pm

Re: [solved] Bummer. Main Char taken down. (reason?)

Postby Dataslycer » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:24 pm

Darwoth55 wrote:is it......... because.......... you.......

HAVE LOTS OF HIGHLY SKILLED STRENGTH STAT!?!?

well color me unimpressed.

and, yeah i said melee dominant due the fact that all but the green caped crusader had swords out the entire time. i guess whoever the other guy was couldnt figure out which weapon he wanted to be ineffectual with and was having a difficult time choosing which fashion accessory to stand around doing nothing with.


i dont bother with melee combat, that is one of the first things an astute individual would notice about this game

"lol here i go following a guy for 45 minutes because i had to aggro him and generate points first before i could take a swing, tur hur"

the fact that all but one of my accosters were melee dominant goes all the more to show the naive nature of not only those particular players but those who they fight as well, though i guess when 90% of your confrontations are against someones hearthfire it doesnt matter as much :lol:


Make up your mind, is melee good or bad for you? You're only responding message to message without taking into account what you said before.


Also
I'm willing to make a newbie alt in leather armor if you wish to combat with your nifty soldier sword. ^^


I can make him q10 strength. So I can punch you repeatedly for 33 if you are so inclined ^^
Last edited by Dataslycer on Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you keep focusing on the shadow behind, you will not see the light in front of you.

Being successful isn't just about hard work and succeeding, it is also about picking yourself up when you fail.
User avatar
Dataslycer
 
Posts: 1420
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest