The Xymop Question

[ARCHIVE FOR WORLD 3]Forum for discussing in game politics, village relations and matters of justice.

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby Crador » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:51 pm

rye130 wrote:Killing you would solve nothing, except relieve some built up rage :)
Xymop killing Tru wouldn't solve any problems they are having, it'd just leave trackable scents which is more likely to cause 1 of them to die then letting Tru is.

Not only killing Truth0 will not actually solve anything, but wasting time for this useless act will proove him right and solid.

P.S. Not to mention an advertisment this guy makes for Xymop (pronounced as Khutor), bumping up it's name all the time and spending his strength to post here :)
Crador
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:40 am

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby hasaosan » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:54 pm

rye130 wrote:Killing you would solve nothing, except relieve some built up rage :)

Xymop killing Tru wouldn't solve any problems they are having, it'd just leave trackable scents which is more likely to cause 1 of them to die then letting Tru is.

killing me would also gain u nothing >.> seance i infact have almost nothing... best things i have are jars of leechs and like 6-8 silk worms and thats all

would solve tru qqing on the forums
hasaosan
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:41 pm

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby hasaosan » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:54 pm

Crador wrote:
rye130 wrote:Killing you would solve nothing, except relieve some built up rage :)
Xymop killing Tru wouldn't solve any problems they are having, it'd just leave trackable scents which is more likely to cause 1 of them to die then letting Tru is.

Not only killing Truth0 will not actually solve anything, but wasting time for this useless act will proove him right and solid.

P.S. Not to mention an advertisment this guy makes for Xymop (pronounced as Khutor), bumping up it's name all the time and spending his strength to post here :)

hmm u have a point here
hasaosan
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:41 pm

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby Jackard » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:51 pm

hasaosan wrote:ill solve this entire thing.....

arent you the guy that had stats in the 30s
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby Truth0 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:48 am

Crador wrote:stuff


One person, for the millionth time, stole from them without our knowledge. He was the most experienced of us all and joined us after we had played for a few days. He had been playing for quite some time. Technically he is a part of our group, but he also lives and works solo. Because they have stolen things from us and destroyed our property that gives us the right to go onto their property and destroy all of their things? Is that what you're saying?

They said not to steal after they had already murdered the thief. You can't warn someone to not do a deed after it has already been done.

The owner of the claim was online today and I asked why the claim was down. He responded with that they (Xymop) had already trespassed multiple time (which you did to enter our house looking for me, as well as someone else from your village a few hours before), as well as destroyed some of our property (the only proof is that we saw that their people had trespassed and our fences and chicken coop were missing, along with the crops nearby). So that explains the claim, although not why all of a sudden all of our items disappeared despite having seen no non-Xymop players in our week+ stay.


What we're back to:
1. Someone who is the least apart of our "gang" stole without our consent or knowledge, possibly before he even settled down with us, and he was murdered in return. Then the rest of us had our lives threatened and then our property destroyed. His property was never touched. Wasn't much an eye for an eye in the first place (murder for theft), not to mention our items were removed and not his (in order to leave no scent no doubt).
2. I indeed accused them of aggressive policies. A few people in this forum agreed, a few did not. How did they respond? Overreaction, threats of murder, and destruction of property. Sounds like aggression to me. Then they provided their own proof against themselves. The thief had already been murdered a day or two before they threatened us for theft. They then continued to threaten me after I accused them for murder and theft of past settlements (mostly to see their reaction, but that is irrelevant).
3. Please, tell me, O Mighty Crador, when did I ever say that we were better than them (although it seems fairly obvious in my mind ;) ). When did I ever say I wanted all villages to unite against Xymop? When did I say all Xymop citizens should be punished? When did I say the citizens directly responsible for the destruction of our property, the murder of our acquaintance, and the threats against our lives should be punished, let alone murdered? Never, that's when. Again, it's more fanciful lies in your own head to make them seem more just in their decisions. If they hadn't been too dumb to check behind the cupboard I'd be dead right now, because obviously one person's mistake of theft should have resulted in everyone's permanent death.

Try again?
Truth0
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 am

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby sabinati » Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:10 am

to be honest i kind of want to kill you myself at this point
User avatar
sabinati
 
Posts: 15513
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:25 am
Location: View active topics

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby Truth0 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:26 am

sabinati wrote:to be honest i kind of want to kill you myself at this point


That's fine. I can see how volatile people are in this game. Or really bored. Or both. Either way the only chance for amusement is hoping someone steals from you or insults your mother and then proceed to murder them. Taking their pants is also a must.
Truth0
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:12 am

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby oreguru » Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:38 am

Dear sir Truth0,
You make no sense, please find some truth which you seem to have lost in some way or another and re submit your attemt with less emotion involved in order to make sense.

all i see you do, is post some non context nonsense that accuses Xymop without evidence(you should up your perception, really, maybe find few scents or something) , while you are still not sure yourself whether your friend is actually a friend and part of your group or whether he was just sheltering nearby and thus involved you in this dispute?

And, reading your "sum up" points, you still make no sense as you just twist the words to some of your special understanding (as i got it) and try to blame it all on "that one guy who i dont really know, and he even lives separatedly" (i guess you need to share bed in order to be related? ) ...

Threats and verbal aspects of communications differ from language to language, from culture to culture, shall you take that into account for your future mischievous adventures, you might actually adapt and not overreact, as that makes no solid ground for defense as you require in such situation to prove your right and their wrong.

well, in short - imo, you sir failed.
oreguru
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:06 pm

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby hasaosan » Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:57 am

Jackard wrote:
hasaosan wrote:ill solve this entire thing.....

arent you the guy that had stats in the 30s

was meaning id offer a solution sorry u couldnt understand
hasaosan
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:41 pm

Re: The Xymop Question

Postby Jackard » Fri Dec 24, 2010 5:10 am

heh sorry they dont need a scrub to be mediator for them
User avatar
Jackard
 
Posts: 8849
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:07 am
Location: fucking curios how do they work

PreviousNext

Return to [ARCHIVE]In Congress Assembled

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 1 guest