viciousgamer04 junk

[Moracin]

This sounds pretty good. Less tedium, more fun.
I only fear the time it takes until it gets implemented.

About half a year I reckon?

[theTrav]

bump digity

[Lothaudus]

but it hasn't been half a year yet

[theTrav]

bump till you can't bump no more!

[ViciousGamer04]

Here is the idea: an item that is relatively simple to maintain, that has an area of effect similar to a village claim or beehive. This item would absorb all the destructive decay hits to your stuff. If left untended, it could last an average of a couple rl days before being destroyed by decay.

The point is to allow tended claims to be a bit more resistive to decay, especially the more fragile stuff, like drying racks (and palisades ). This item could be maintained by repairing it instead of all the other stuff. What repairs would cost I haven't decided on yet.

Sounds like something a botter would want implemented, imo.

I am against this for what I stated above(would make this too convenient for botters.)... but I would like a slower decay rate on stuff as it's a bit ridiculous(and apparently broken.)

Wow, I can't believe this idea is so old and still hasn't been implemented, it' s perfect.

TOO perfect, and TOO easy to ABUSE(botters n' such.)

[DatOneGuy]

Here is the idea: an item that is relatively simple to maintain, that has an area of effect similar to a village claim or beehive. This item would absorb all the destructive decay hits to your stuff. If left untended, it could last an average of a couple rl days before being destroyed by decay.

The point is to allow tended claims to be a bit more resistive to decay, especially the more fragile stuff, like drying racks (and palisades ). This item could be maintained by repairing it instead of all the other stuff. What repairs would cost I haven't decided on yet.

Sounds like something a botter would want implemented, imo.

I am against this for what I stated above(would make this too convenient for botters.)... but I would like a slower decay rate on stuff as it's a bit ridiculous(and apparently broken.)

You're still just as bad as you were before I see.

This helps players more than it does `botters`. Anyone with a macro can have the macro fix them as it is, they just have to click a little less, big deal. Although I doubt anyone bothers, whatever.

I'm guessing you still think that half the players are sitting around botting inside palisades inside houses 24/7.

[ViciousGamer04]

Here is the idea: an item that is relatively simple to maintain, that has an area of effect similar to a village claim or beehive. This item would absorb all the destructive decay hits to your stuff. If left untended, it could last an average of a couple rl days before being destroyed by decay.

The point is to allow tended claims to be a bit more resistive to decay, especially the more fragile stuff, like drying racks (and palisades ). This item could be maintained by repairing it instead of all the other stuff. What repairs would cost I haven't decided on yet.

Sounds like something a botter would want implemented, imo.

I am against this for what I stated above(would make this too convenient for botters.)... but I would like a slower decay rate on stuff as it's a bit ridiculous(and apparently broken.)

You're still just as bad as you were before I see.

This helps players more than it does `botters`. Anyone with a macro can have the macro fix them as it is, they just have to click a little less, big deal. Although I doubt anyone bothers, whatever.

I'm guessing you still think that half the players are sitting around botting inside palisades inside houses 24/7.

Haha, ahhhh. Forum troll stalking my posts noooeeezz.

Eh. At this point I don't know. I only recently sorta' started playing again. Before it was a pretty big % of them. When you locate the bots hideouts it's so fun to torment them(since 96% of the time they're not there near their computer to even do anything back.)

Anyways. Making it more convenient for botters only attracts more botters. This doesn't just make it a "bit more convenient", this makes it a LOT more convenient for botters to survive.

I couldn't tell you how botters bot within H&H but I have gotten quite a few forum members to admit that they do in fact, bot. Of course, by the time they figure out they admitted it unknowingly... if they figure it out(They aren't the brightest.) it'll be like. 20 years from now and chances are they probably still wouldn't be playing H&H. Bahaha.

[Potjeh]

Sounds like someone doesn't repair a wall thousand of tiles long on a weekly basis.

[Sarge]

Also, didn't know wtf he was talking about before and after he admits to taking a break and asking 'what is new' and therefore still has no clue, he thinks he is able to fly a dismissive comment to a nice idea for a fairly complex issue, without credibility.

[sabinati]

Eh. At this point I don't know. I only recently sorta' started playing again. Before it was a pretty big % of them. When you locate the bots hideouts it's so fun to torment them(since 96% of the time they're not there near their computer to even do anything back.)

Anyways. Making it more convenient for botters only attracts more botters. This doesn't just make it a "bit more convenient", this makes it a LOT more convenient for botters to survive.

I couldn't tell you how botters bot within H&H but I have gotten quite a few forum members to admit that they do in fact, bot. Of course, by the time they figure out they admitted it unknowingly... if they figure it out(They aren't the brightest.) it'll be like. 20 years from now and chances are they probably still wouldn't be playing H&H. Bahaha.

ok you are fucking done posting