therefore I select the points to which I can respond. It is unfair to think you, or anyone else, does different and is not mindful of how they spend their time addressing points. I create very few posts where I do not address as much as I can. It's not cherrypicking. It's time management. I am sorry I cannot satisfy you (nor the others to whom you refer) with the thousands of words I've written.
Hey man, with all due respect please don't presume to say you know my posting style. I do reply to every point until whoever questions me is satisfied, unless I feel they are trolling or there just for the debate.
That's not the point though. If you intend to lead or be the spokesperson of a peaceful democratic or representative government, you are expected to be open to dialogue, to different opinions, and to address everyone's concerns with clarity and unambiguously. You cannot dismiss criticisms and ignore questions for any reason whatsoever. And democracy is all about ad homines, which is why I said what I said in my previous post (who are you and who are the leaders that will represent this government?).
From your replies I have already formed have a rough picture of this group, I won't be posting again asking for details. As I said, it's an interesting idea. Has too many red flags, but it's nevertheless interesting to observe.
Smell of Arrogance
