Nooby/nobody same thing.
You said nobody had claimed that red was hard to defend against. and I quoted the conversation of you responding to someone saying just that. so obviously some people think it. and I do feel his argument has merit. if u spam red attacks over and over, they will have to do artful or zig zag to remove it, giving u more IP to spam red, a never ending cycle of attacks. while before, you actually couldn't do red attacks over and over because you would eventually run low on IP and have to start doing Thinks to continue.
Until DIS and fire and ice get into a big fight again, I don't think I really trust any of your opinions.
for example, people claiming parry is overpowered.... well that's only if you fight back against the guy. which basically never happens at the moment. Its either you have more guys than your opponent or your running. So its actually kind of weird to see people talking about using parry decks in big fights as to me its pointless and oak stance/shield/combat meditation would probably be better. I can only see parry working well in a duel type situation, which is probably how people are testing the combat changes right now, which is why they feel its overpowered. Not saying it shouldn't be changed though. its just I don't see myself running parry while either on the defensive running away, or on the offensive attacking someone.