So why did you mention it; other than being disingenuous.TemuSoldier wrote:well now hold on, I wouldn’t say world 7 has “active players”
Audiosmurf wrote:I am a racist and a homosexual
Audiosmurf wrote:Doxx me again if it bothers you so you dumbass black gorilla retard
Schwarzvald wrote:What's the long term goal here?
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
Schwarzvald wrote:So why did you mention it; other than being disingenuous.TemuSoldier wrote:well now hold on, I wouldn’t say world 7 has “active players”
A PvE continent or world is what people really want. Cater to the same 200 people until they're dead? What's the long term goal here?
loftar wrote:Do I really have to spell it out for you? My point is this: What do you do on a non-PvP server when someone:
Starts building a village idol to claim the land around you;
Takes ten alts to block the exit of your palisade gate;
Builds a palisade around your claim;
Plants a tight forest all around you, or conversely, cuts down all the trees around you;
Simply stands in your way;
Runs away with the carcass of the animal you just killed; or
Just decides to settle down next to you while you don't like him?
These, and many other conceivable actions, are far easier ways to grief people than is PvP, and PvP is the only thing that keeps them somewhat in check. Therefore, removing PvP results not in less griefing, but in more.
In case it's not obvious, I'm not denying that some people just want to live in peace, and I don't think it would be a bad thing if they could do that. But removing PvP does not result in that.
Cool post from ten years ago. Was your point to illustrate a lack of development toward the majority?Zephroze wrote:Schwarzvald wrote:So why did you mention it; other than being disingenuous.TemuSoldier wrote:well now hold on, I wouldn’t say world 7 has “active players”
A PvE continent or world is what people really want. Cater to the same 200 people until they're dead? What's the long term goal here?loftar wrote:Do I really have to spell it out for you? My point is this: What do you do on a non-PvP server when someone:
Starts building a village idol to claim the land around you;
Takes ten alts to block the exit of your palisade gate;
Builds a palisade around your claim;
Plants a tight forest all around you, or conversely, cuts down all the trees around you;
Simply stands in your way;
Runs away with the carcass of the animal you just killed; or
Just decides to settle down next to you while you don't like him?
These, and many other conceivable actions, are far easier ways to grief people than is PvP, and PvP is the only thing that keeps them somewhat in check. Therefore, removing PvP results not in less griefing, but in more.
In case it's not obvious, I'm not denying that some people just want to live in peace, and I don't think it would be a bad thing if they could do that. But removing PvP does not result in that.
https://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44710
Audiosmurf wrote:I am a racist and a homosexual
Audiosmurf wrote:Doxx me again if it bothers you so you dumbass black gorilla retard
Schwarzvald wrote:Cool post from ten years ago. Was your point to illustrate a lack of interest toward the majority?
jorb wrote:Hitting a "Ghejejiiwlonk" with your "Umappawoozle" for eightyfifteen points of "Sharmakookel", simply makes no sense.
randomtelelocxyz wrote:want wish to jorb stop loving gayanal porn
jorb wrote:
The best of luck in World 16.1, and...
ENJOY!
jorb wrote:2025 could have been a lot better development wise. We are hopeful for 2026.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Trendiction [Bot] and 11 guests