Game Development: Death

Announcements about major changes in Haven & Hearth.

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby lachlaan » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:45 pm

loftar wrote:
lachlaan wrote:Instate groups calculated by kin allegiance, town memberships, anything of the sort

I don't really see how this helps anything. If the point is that having alts makes your "mains" less powerful, then just don't include the alts in the party/town/whatever, no?


That was just me thinking out loud about how to not make it exploitable. Could be as simple as defaulting it to bunch up and average people targetting the same person, or the same pre-formed group, if all else fails. Or you guys can consider a solution for that part of it, but all in all would it not encourage progress over numbers?
lachlaan
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:32 pm

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby loftar » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:49 pm

lachlaan wrote:Could be as simple as defaulting it to bunch up and average people targetting the same person

Seems I would simply bring a couple of alts with me on any journey, then, in order to bring down the average of anyone targeting me. :)

Trying to make the game mechanically identify "actual" groups seems extremely difficult.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 9056
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby lachlaan » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:52 pm

Indeed, that was the issue with braziers being normalized as well :P people were building unfueled ones to bring down the average. It'd be tricky to get right that's for sure, but idk, perhaps worth looking into. And it might still be a big ol clusterfuck to have people trying to target any one of the alts with all the other alts in order to prevent someone from just systematically taking them all down.
lachlaan
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:32 pm

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby Kaios » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:54 pm

loftar wrote:Trying to make the game mechanically identify "actual" groups seems extremely difficult.


I heard there's a party system looking for some love
User avatar
Kaios
 
Posts: 9176
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby strpk0 » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:54 pm

I'm just throwing stuff out there, but would only allowing 1 person at a time to attack the same character help with the alting thing in any way? Also perhaps increasing the advantage you get from having higher combat stats. Maybe like this the only way your alt is gonna be worth a damn against a proper "main" character is if it becomes your main character anyway.

Now I know the "no multi way combat" thing can be easily exploited, but there's ways to fix that too. Just food for thought.
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.

Image
User avatar
strpk0
 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby Ethan » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:55 pm

I would be interested to hear J-lo's thoughts on the 'End Game'.

When you have a decent hermitage or large village setup and running smoothly, is the end game to just keep grinding up Q?
Is it to use your high Q to wage war on those around you?
Expand into a very large thriving city?
Build creatively?

I think trying to be too 'sandbox' and trying to fit every aspect of play style is just making all of them more bland.

I think there needs to be a clear end game goal(s), something for a village/individual to actually strive towards. Then it might become more clear what type of game this is, and what mechanics should be introduced to balance the end game.
Right now there doesn't seem to much reason to grind Q, unless you want a competitive advantage over your rivals, which is then not that important with the current ram situation.
Ethan
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:14 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby loftar » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:56 pm

strpk0 wrote:I'm just throwing stuff out there, but would only allowing 1 person at a time to attack the same character help with the alting thing in any way?

Seems like the opposite. If I wanted to not get attacked, I'd just have an alt follow me around in combat constantly.
"Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing." -- Rob Pike
User avatar
loftar
 
Posts: 9056
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby dvsmasta » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:57 pm

No permadeath = no reason for lots of alts. Such a simple and beautiful solution.
dvsmasta
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:58 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby dvsmasta » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:57 pm

loftar wrote:
strpk0 wrote:I'm just throwing stuff out there, but would only allowing 1 person at a time to attack the same character help with the alting thing in any way?

Seems like the opposite. If I wanted to not get attacked, I'd just have an alt follow me around in combat constantly.


Agreed - that would be easily exploitable.
dvsmasta
 
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:58 am

Re: Game Development: Death

Postby strpk0 » Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:01 pm

loftar wrote:
strpk0 wrote:I'm just throwing stuff out there, but would only allowing 1 person at a time to attack the same character help with the alting thing in any way?

Seems like the opposite. If I wanted to not get attacked, I'd just have an alt follow me around in combat constantly.


Yeah, that's what I mentioned could happen. But there's ways to avoid that too. Though in all honesty I can't really come up with any good ones. Maybe making the combat "lock" time out if no proper damage is dealt to the other person within X amount of time (perhaps even just damaging their armour)? That way, even if you have an alt following you around with a bot or something it would actually have to constantly do some damage to you to be of any use.
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.

Image
User avatar
strpk0
 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot], Trendiction [Bot] and 195 guests