sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Burinn wrote:You'd think "It's out when it's out" would be common knowledge at this point.
FictionRyu wrote:Burinn wrote:You'd think "It's out when it's out" would be common knowledge at this point.
You'd think, but today's world is always in such a rush. It's not just age specific either, it's just kind-of how this society is now-a-days..
The_Blode wrote:The problem, from my perspective, is that LOADS of other in-development games are being developed by people who are willing to set a concrete update schedule (actual updates to the game or news of what they're working on) and force themselves to keep it. This gives the players reason to believe every indev game should do this. I personally think forcing a schedule just increases the risk of rushed content or lying to the people who read your updates.
There should be more widespread focus on transparency like J+L or Toady try to, not just gathering up the best looking bits to show everyone once a week/month.
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
jorb wrote:Ideally the game should play itself.
ricky wrote:I don't need a weekly content update, but I do want at least a weekly "in the pipe" post.
Kaios wrote:Spice Girls are integral to understanding Ysh's thought process when communicating, duly noted.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 42 guests