jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
MightySheep wrote:wtf is "good client" ? you run in a straight line and drink, where does the client come into it?
Granger wrote:Fuck off, please go grow yourself some decency.
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
jorb wrote:The reworked health we had planned to use has, unfortunately, not made it past quality assurance, and we will not be pushing those intended changes. Thank you for all your passionate feedback!
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 43 guests