mvgulik wrote:Thanks for letting me know I'm right in my views.
If being deemed antisocial for having no tolerance for the intolerant. ... I'm fine with that.
Lmao
mvgulik wrote:Thanks for letting me know I'm right in my views.
If being deemed antisocial for having no tolerance for the intolerant. ... I'm fine with that.
mvgulik wrote:Thanks for letting me know I'm right in my views.
If being deemed antisocial for having no tolerance for the intolerant. ... I'm fine with that.
mvgulik wrote:Thanks for letting me know I'm right in my views.
If being deemed antisocial for having no tolerance for the intolerant. ... I'm fine with that.
Me wrote:thank mvgulik for nazi moderating the wiki so nobody updates it now
mvgulik wrote:Thanks for letting me know I'm right in my views.
If being deemed antisocial for having no tolerance for the intolerant. ... I'm fine with that.
Avu wrote:Yeah another match starts in half an hour anyway you can try again and again. One single failure is likely a critical failure and more likely than not results in a loss of a player. If that's intended devs are even less sane than I give them credit for.
mvgulik wrote:Data quality is a general and innate real world problem when it comes to relative large and/or fluid data collections.
... The multitude of high prices products that advertise to be a solution to this nicely reflects this.
jorb wrote:We've been developing, and here's what's new.
Enjoy!
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], PetalBot [Bot], Python-Requests [Bot] and 5 guests