vatas wrote:my planned response of "just use shift+enter so you load up as an eyeball first and can abort the transfer if it's unsafe" won't help with this one.
I don't see why something like that could not be implemented though.
vatas wrote:my planned response of "just use shift+enter so you load up as an eyeball first and can abort the transfer if it's unsafe" won't help with this one.
Fostik wrote:Rewriting one custom client feature per week, rather than use already existent and tested by thousands of people opensource code of any custom clients, plus, no new ingame features, or changes to old ones?
Well, the good thing in this story is that after 2-3 years of development like that we will have 50% of current amber features in vanilla.
SnuggleSnail wrote:At very least I think everybody would agree dying in a loading screen is less than ideal, and oh boy, I've killed a lot of people in house loading screens.
Fostik wrote:Don't get me wrong this is still good, but IMO those features can be cherry picked from Amber/Ender repositories and added by dozens per week, if only not devs recognized custom clients as evil.
Enjoyment_2 wrote:imagine turning all the icons on and trying to see anything on that shit
Schattengaenger wrote:looks better than triangles, squares and whatnot.
mvgulik wrote:(which probably also consider such a feature cheating, as its not in the official client)
Users browsing this forum: Python-Requests [Bot] and 28 guests