LadyV wrote:Why not just designate the only thing you can build on a claim you don't have permission to is siege items?
I like that idea, but what about walls around your ram to keep it safe while drying?
LadyV wrote:Why not just designate the only thing you can build on a claim you don't have permission to is siege items?
SuperNoob wrote:LadyV wrote:Why not just designate the only thing you can build on a claim you don't have permission to is siege items?
I like that idea, but what about walls around your ram to keep it safe while drying?
LadyV wrote:If you have the intent for war then commit to it and guard it.
SuperNoob wrote:LadyV wrote:If you have the intent for war then commit to it and guard it.
can't be online 24 hours straight guarding a ram...
I agree some things are just too easy when it comes to griefing, but you don't want to go overboard on a fix and break more stuff.
LadyV wrote:Siege should not be easy.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
lol of course they're going to alt vault everything...and I think this probably needs to be moved to C&I nowbmjclark wrote:break the wall to the now empty town you're ramming.
I never said it should, but if you're not able to protect your ram(and its impossible without a wall) you can't seige at all. also think of abandonned claims just sitting about(less of a problem now than it was last world), you can't revoke the privelege if you can't get to the stake, but if you leave a ram outside a wall anyone who sees it(whether its their claim or not) is more than likely going to break it. the goody-goody players will break it to protect the claim's owner while the baddies will break it just to piss someone off...LadyV wrote:Siege should not be easy.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 4 guests