jorb wrote:Not entirely sure I see the point. Also: Great titling of a threadstart.
Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10
Cece wrote:Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10
i dont know why haven doesn't mail people updates and remind them that this game still exists, i mean i get that most people wont likely return after being deeply disappointed in that sudden p2p model shift but atleast some would come back, i have yet to return and i dont think i would for the same reason but i may change my mind if the playercount is atleast 300
Onep wrote:Cece wrote:Onep wrote:Splitting the small player-base even more is not necessary. 0/10
i dont know why haven doesn't mail people updates and remind them that this game still exists, i mean i get that most people wont likely return after being deeply disappointed in that sudden p2p model shift but atleast some would come back, i have yet to return and i dont think i would for the same reason but i may change my mind if the playercount is atleast 300
You're a subhuman with an anime avatar. Go spend your NEETbux on animu figurines to post in your 'hotglue' threads.
Sebthegrand wrote:i bet that perma server would have a much higher pop for the simple fact people wouldn't be waiting for a world reset lmao. game takes way to much effort for world resets, salems garbage but they pull it off somehow
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 67 guests