To the records question:
It's been a long while since I've done any reading on this... my college years to be precise. I just recall some of the ship manifests being excerpted in side notes... and they were kept about like you'd keep a record of any other commodity. "30 bodies thrown overboard today." Compare to "Pirate attack last night. Ship damaged, but floating. 5 tonne sugar either lost to damage or thrown overboard to lighten load." How historians have come up with the figures they have are usually part of the forward or an appendix in a book. And too often, I think they've made "best guess" estimates. The records that have survived are pretty well kept. Too many records have been lost to time due to acts of man and acts of God.
wonder-ass wrote:good and evil is a man made concept tho.
Oh, I'm quite sure that this is the thread for it, but I won't argue that point (because I completely agree with you). The point I'd like to make is that we can't function without it yet, if we ever can. (We can get there, I think, but it would require some fundamental changes to how we treat each other.) For the present, I think that we've developed a pretty strong sense of what is "good" and "evil" based on the society we have been raised in. (What I think is up for debate is whether such things apply to all the things some people want to apply them to: sex, drugs, games/entertainment, "principles of justice," etc. Another point probably not worth picking up here... and not sure I could do a good job arguing any of it, anyway.)
There is also "severity of evil" that can be debated, which is kind of the whole point here. As far as I can see, there are three general levels. Those that hurt the self only, those that hurt the community, and those that hurt society or the world over periods of history. It's hard to separate the first two, but that's not even close to what this conversation is about. For the third, there is no ranking them. If you or your society have committed such an atrocity as that will resound for centuries to come, such as the two mentioned here, you're just as guilt as the others in the list you think you're not as bad as.
The mind fuck is that we as a species need these sort of things to learn and grow from. Then, when we've grown a bit as a result of such atrocities, can we really call them completely evil?
I, too, have a cat. Those are some vicious little creatures. Mine will just drop a mouse into a box and let it scurry around... not kill it, not even really physically injure it. Just use it as a play toy*. Last one I found had clearly been in there a while as there were too many scratch marks and chew holes of it trying to escape. Dogs aren't any better before any of you dog people go thinking you have the superior pet. Anyway, the debate between "being human" and "being animal" is probably way deeper than anyone wants to go here, and there are a ton of great books on the matter. Might be worth it as sometimes I wonder about the motivations behind some of the atrocities of the world.
*worth noting that hungry animals don't play with their food. they just kill and eat.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.