Guns for teachers - The MemePresident

[dageir]

The solution to the worlds problems right now is a debt jubilee where all debt is forgiven.
Too bad for the creditors though.

[synaris]

More wars and unconditional support for Israel, how's that not globalist agenda? And you're all for it.

So how's the weather in your FEMA camp?

1: preparing for the possibility of war is not the same as starting one. you oughtta know that.

and 2: what unconditional support for israel are you talking about? all trump did was move our embassy to israels capitol. if im not mistaken when we have an embassy in another country, it is always at their capitol. why is this a big deal?

[dageir]

synaris seems to be a troll. Disregard him.

[Potjeh]

Except he is doing his best to start one. He's stirring shit up with North Korea, when he's well aware they aren't going to use them for offence, they just want them to protect themselves from US invasion. And looking at Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, I can't say I blame them. Or how about stirring shit up with Iran, just when they're starting to move towards secularism. Instead America is going to bring them "freedom" like they did in Iraq, ie they're gonna create a power vacuum so ISIS 2.0 has room to grow and the war on terror can keep going. But honestly, do you really think America isn't sufficiently prepared for war and it needs 10% higher military budget? You already have a bigger budget than the next seven countries combined, and most of those countries are your allies. That's plenty for defending own territory, the only reason you'd need more is to go around "liberating" countries that threaten the petrodollar.

On the other hand, he's being best buds with countries that play along with the petrodollar, like Saudi Arabia. Isn't it funny how his travel ban excluded Saudis even though Osama Bin Laden was one and 15 of the 19 men involved in 9/11 attacks were Saudi? And how Trump bragged about a $110 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia? At a time when they're invading Yemen and holding Lebanese prime minster hostage, no less. And why hasn't he voiced support for Tulsi Gabbard's Stop Arming Terrorists Act?

[synaris]

synaris seems to be a troll. Disregard him.

fuck off with your bullshit. if i wanted to be lied to id go back to talking with shubla.

Except he is doing his best to start one. He's stirring shit up with North Korea, when he's well aware they aren't going to use them for offence, they just want them to protect themselves from US invasion. And looking at Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, I can't say I blame them. Or how about stirring shit up with Iran, just when they're starting to move towards secularism. Instead America is going to bring them "freedom" like they did in Iraq, ie they're gonna create a power vacuum so ISIS 2.0 has room to grow and the war on terror can keep going. But honestly, do you really think America isn't sufficiently prepared for war and it need 10% higher military budget? You already have a bigger budget than the next seven countries combined, and most of those countries are your allies. That's plenty for defending own territory, the only reason you'd need more is to around "liberating" countries that threaten the petrodollar.

holy shit, you got it ass backwards again. kim jong un started shit with us and our allies first. also, if north korea only cares about protecting themselves from the US, then why in the fuck would they be shooting missiles at japan? if they only care about defending themselves from a superpower what advantage would there be in gaining more enemies?

and yes trump didnt back down when kim started threatening people. trump stiffened his back puffed out his chest and said BRING. IT. ON. and the pathetic wimp known as kim jong un didnt know what to do, because he has never seen someone not back down before. he's a far cry from his grandaddy. he's a spoiled brat who is used to getting his way by throwing a tantrum.

and stirring shit up with all of those other countries was wrong, but trump didnt do that he was against that, there are clips of trump saying no, do not go into iraq. and once they did go into iraq, he said to take the oil. but we didnt take the oil WE LEFT IT THERE and thats how isis got funded in the first place.

bigger military budget than the "next 7" combined? what 7? you comparing us to china and russia, or shithole countries?

and he the travel ban covered the areas where the violent muslims were coming in not the ones that werent fucking with us. that didnt include saudi arabia. not all of the muslims get along, thats why fucking with iran and iraq was such a bad idea. they were at odds with each other.

in case it wasnt obvious, my memory is terrible. so ill have paul explain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNu4xU9qOEM

[Potjeh]

Next 7 as in the next 7 biggest budgets. USA = $611 billion. China ($215 billion) + Russia($70 billion) + Saudi Arabia($64 billion) + India($56 billion) + France($56 billion) + United Kingdom($48 billion) + Japan ($46 billion) = $555 billion.

And this Kim is doing what all Kims have been doing since Korean War: empty posturing. He wants USA to know he has nuclear capabilities so you guys don't dare to invade him. If you do invade, though, your South Korean allies' capitol will be obliterated even with just conventional artillery. But fuck allies, eh?

How are Saudis not fucking with you when they are *the* biggest state sponsor of terror? Read up on Wahhabism sometimes. But I guess you need to be on good terms with them because CIA needs them as a middleman for getting weapons to ISIS.

[dageir]

I guess each serviceman (or woman) gets better paid in the US. compared to China.

[Potjeh]

Personel costs were just $135.2 billion in 2015, down from $153.2 billion in 2010.

[synaris]

Next 7 as in the next 7 biggest budgets. USA = $611 billion. China ($215 billion) + Russia($70 billion) + Saudi Arabia($64 billion) + India($56 billion) + France($56 billion) + United Kingdom($48 billion) + Japan ($46 billion) = $555 billion.

And this Kim is doing what all Kims have been doing since Korean War: empty posturing. He wants USA to know he has nuclear capabilities so you guys don't dare to invade him. If you do invade, though, your South Korean allies' capitol will be obliterated even with just conventional artillery. But fuck allies, eh?

How are Saudis not fucking with you when they are *the* biggest state sponsor of terror? Read up on Wahhabism sometimes. But I guess you need to be on good terms with them because CIA needs them as a middleman for getting weapons to ISIS.

yeah our goverment came up with lots of ways to intentionally waste money in the past in order to destroy us. like spending over 100k to put a damn shrimp n a treadmill. and those numbers are pretty damn huge. cant lie. feels like im missing something though. i wanna see what that 555 billion goes towards.

ill have to read up on wahhabism later. im getting sleepy again. sorry i cant stick around and debate more today.

and yes the CIA is pure evil and did ship weapons to isis. trump stopped that.

anyways, why is it "empty posturing" when kim does it, but its provoking a war when trump does it? you dont see any double standards there? and like i said, trump isnt the one actually firing test missiles at other nations.

edit: forgot about this

I guess each serviceman (or woman) gets better paid in the US. compared to China.

chinese citizens get treated like complete shit. theres whole documentaries you can watch about the factory workers that put together toys and shit for crane machines you see in wal mart that get paid the equivilent of 25 cents an hour. and how it takes 2 of em, boyfriend and girlfriend to afford the tiniest of little shitstain apartments. working harder than most folks and having less. thats what you get under communism.

[MagicManICT]

wether or not a company supports republicans is pointless. were they best for the job or not?

That's the point. They weren't the best pick, but were picked because of political ties.

puerto rico being US territory is news to me. alright i concede that one.

That you're a US Citizen and don't know this is no surprise. We were all taught the 50 states and state capitals and such in geography and social studies (whether you remember it or not), but few schools actually teach the US territories with the same emphasis. To note: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_territory. Puerto Rico is verges on becoming a state, but politics... The four other major territories have the option to become a state, but don't seem to show the desire. That article gets a little deep, but there's a listing down the page a ways of the US territories.

why is it "empty posturing" when kim does it, but its provoking a war when trump does it?

Which is more likely to scare you? The chihuahua behind the fence snarling and yapping at you trying to look like it'll attack, or the pit bull in your face growling and looking business? This is the difference between Kim and Trump. That and how can anyone really take anyone else that is good buddies with Dennis Rodman too seriously? (I think that's why so many people don't take Trump seriously. )