Robben_DuMarsch wrote:It's like suing McDonald's for their hot coffee on steroids.
That specific case, iirc, had merit though: serving coffee that can give 3rd degree burns in <10 seconds in unstable containers and the victim that only went to court to get the medical bill covered and the final verdict factored in the 700+ people injured prior (of which McDonald's knew about - and did nothing). The media reported it as being fraudulent though, including plenty of wrong statements and painting her as a gold digger...
"[W]hoever, being of the age of 18 years and upwards, by any act corrupts or tends to corrupt the morals of any minor less than 18 years of age . . . commits a misdemeanor of the first degree."
Nice. Moral based law where the damage is purely in the eye of the beholder, what can possibly go wrong?
I'm sure there are some creative ways to mess with people in it.