sMartins wrote:b

sMartins wrote:I'm saying all of this, cause nowdays we make the huge mistake of thinking that science is the "true", it's not, it's just one, between multiple, of our skills.
We cannot beleive in science, it's an absurd.
Alitis wrote:what ? ... you are using a computer to say this ? are you trolling ? " Believing " has nothing to do with science.
sMartins wrote:Exactly, right ... but sadly we beleive in science these days ....
sMartins wrote:Feel free to explain me this then:
Alitis wrote:So what are you proposing we should " believe " in ?
sMartins wrote:What you want to know? I don't know that much ( I don't remember that much) but I did one exam at the University in quantum mechanic.
DDDsDD999 wrote:sMartins wrote:What you want to know? I don't know that much ( I don't remember that much) but I did one exam at the University in quantum mechanic.
Explain to me how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle equation you linked has relevancy to the topic.
sMartins wrote:DDDsDD999 wrote:sMartins wrote:What you want to know? I don't know that much ( I don't remember that much) but I did one exam at the University in quantum mechanic.
Explain to me how the Heisenberg uncertainty principle equation you linked has relevancy to the topic.
Already did:
"In quantum physics, however, each observation implies an intervention in the observed. Because of the quantum physical laws of nature, a change of state of the observed is inevitably coupled to the observation process. So it's not a situation independent from the experiment that is observed, but we ourselves call forth the facts (or compel them to go in a certain direction to a disambiguation), that then become an observation".
Pascual Jordan
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Google [Bot], Trendiction [Bot] and 63 guests