His dick-pic is on Twatter, though.
Not that I care much. We've gotten a ton of users through that vidya, so I'm grateful for that.
jorb wrote:His dick-pic is on Twatter, though.
Not that I care much. We've gotten a ton of users through that vidya, so I'm grateful for that.
Duhhrail wrote:No matter how fast you think you can beat your meat, Jordancoles lies in the shadows and waits to attack his defenseless prey. (tl;dr) Don't afk and jack off.
jordancoles wrote:Is.. Is overtyped actually Projared?
overtyped wrote:Here is the thing. If i see injustice i am going to call it out. I am sick and tired of clown world and idiots who accept words without evidence.
overtyped wrote:OH AND GUESS WHAT REPERCUSSIONS SHE HAD FOR LYING? NOTHING HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
MagicManICT wrote:overtyped wrote:Here is the thing. If i see injustice i am going to call it out. I am sick and tired of clown world and idiots who accept words without evidence.
i'm all with you. Evidence can easily be faked, and in the world of modern computers, it's even easier to do so. Yeah, there's a lot of false accusations. There's a lot of people out there that get what they deserve, too.
Don't let that false sense of morality bite you in the ass, though. I don't know what you have and haven't researched on any case, but a person wanting to wave the "he's guilty" OR "he's innocent" flag need to make sure they're waving the right flag first and done their homework.overtyped wrote:OH AND GUESS WHAT REPERCUSSIONS SHE HAD FOR LYING? NOTHING HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
it's called "defamation of character" and is a very hefty lawsuit. Everyone has to be media aware these days, not just celebrities. Good news is people have memories about as long as their middle finger, and after a year or two, everyone forgot about the whole thing except him, her, and their families that were involved in it. Oh, and maybe a few "social justice warriors" that want to punish people for making false accusations and jumping to conclusions based on lack of evidence.
overtyped wrote:YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO PRESUME INNOCENCE UNTIL HE'S PROVEN GUILTY. THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE BESIDES A WIFE ACCUSING HIM OF SOMETHING WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY PROOF.
Kaios wrote:overtyped wrote:YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO PRESUME INNOCENCE UNTIL HE'S PROVEN GUILTY. THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE BESIDES A WIFE ACCUSING HIM OF SOMETHING WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY PROOF.
It doesn't really matter either way, the "Justice System" rarely ever provides justice to anyone. The court of public opinion is where men receive most of their figurative hangings and in that regard it's clear most have decided upon his guilt, this is both good and bad. Good because people who get away with doing bad things are still receiving a punishment of sorts, like the inability to be hired by any decent employer. Bad because innocent people are also victims of this mentality. It's the way of the world at the moment.
loftar wrote:git da mony
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 38 guests