I appreciate you trying to add some context to jalphas contemptuous, villainous, simplistic and socially inept ramblings, but I fear that you were adding context where none was meant to be.
While I think it would be difficult for anybody to believe that an invasion could seriously not be provoked by something, I don't think I have seen any citations that could have led anybody to know the true price of the ultimatum that Ukraine received. I also think it's a bit unfair to call an ultimatum a "choice." Ukraine didn't choose to be bombed and have 100s of civilians die and buildings reduced to rubble.
People are quick to dismiss the general media for painting things black and white because there are a lot of political happenings behind the curtain over the last few decades and that is fair. The same caution should be used when describing the "woke" version of events. Was all of this a provocation meant to upset Putin, or was it decades of selfish political and economic decisions, or was it both? Did anybody really know that Putin would all out invade with this level of aggression? Was the decision Ukraine made really as black and white as a "be our neutral bitch buffer zone or be bombed" ?
It seems that a lot of people who are really eager to play the devils advocate only do so until they reach the desired outcome and stop short of telling whole truths themselves.