jordancoles wrote:Have your armed yourself? Or has NATO/your government offered weapons/training to you or your area?
Nope, it's nearly impossible - official says we have 6 people willing to join army per riffle they have. Although government formed territorial defense to defend cities and areas, it helps to decrease load on other services, e.g. block posts and patrols.
Regarding weapon for myself, my take is that it's not a good idea to rise a gun against trained soldier, with armor, good reactions, heavy weapons and readiness to kill being just a humble guy who never held weapon. In case if they enter our areas partisanship and Molotov cocktails seems better choice for me.
Regarding NATO, I'm not missing any of Jens Stoltenberg's speeches, and with disappointment hearing all the time "we already helping Ukraine since 2014 blah blah" on any question asking whether they help. Well, the part of it is true, they really helped our army with drills etc., and Ukrainian army showed itself as incredibly strong against outnumbering "2nd army of the world", but there is a thing Ukrainian army need so hard - it's offensive weapon, capable of assault.
Many countries, members of NATO wants to help Ukraine with weapons: artillery, tanks, planes, anti-aircraft systems, whereas NATO blocks all of it(assuming they're fearing conflict escalation because of this), and limits it with only hand anti tank or anti-aerial weapons, they have very limited ranges about 300-3000 meters depends on type, which makes it totally defensive weapons, it can't help in any way on reclaiming occupied area and making counter-attacks.
From what I've heard some countries started supplies of armor and artillery after news from Bucha, gives a hope.
Known as zunzon. Contact discord: zunzon.