MagicManICT wrote:To start (since it's short, and loftar mentioned): gluten free baking is usually about using binder substitutes like flax to hold the bread together.
Gluten-free baking sounds very difficult, as if I have understood correctly, gluten is what makes dough dough.
MagicManICT wrote:2.In Hinduism, all live without red meat, as it's better to milk a cow than to kill it... or any mammal for that matter. It's a tenet of the religion few are willing to break. Some Buddhists have been living as vegans for almost as long as Buddhism has existed (1600+ years).
There would not be enough meat for all hindus if they would decide to start eating meat daily. So they really can not start eating meat either. I dont think that you should call people that dont eat meat because of their religion vegans.
In hinduism, meat eating is not really prohibited, but just discouraged. Only 1/3 of hindus or so do not eat meat at all. Cow is exception to this, as cows are holy.
MagicManICT wrote:Let's also mention that animal farming is one of the biggest producers of free methane on the planet with no way of trapping it short of more factory farming methods (which are bad, both from a humane perspective and nutritional value of the animal as food), and that methane is upwards of 86x as dangerous as CO2.
We must also remember that methane is not that bad greenhouse gas, as it only affects in the atmosphere for about 12 years. Compared to CO2, which stays in the atmosphere for a much longer time, hundreds of years.
Theres also lot of methane trapped in Siberia, under the ice in the ground. If this ice melts, it will all be released into the atmosphere, causing great warming globally, way more than what we have experienced so far. But as a Finn, I would be more worried about shutting down of the gulf stream, which would cause ice-age in Finland and scandinavia.
It wouldn't be nice to think about? That must be so hard for you
I mean, that many things are ethically wrong. For example the clothes that I am wearing have not been produced very ethically, can not know that for sure, but it is very likely. Same with all the other things such as electronics.
I'd rather be informed about what I'm directly supporting instead of turning a blind eye to it or choosing to live in a bubble. When you buy a slab of meat you are telling the store and their sources that their slaughter practices are acceptable to you and that you want more. When enough people buy and tell the company they need more stock, the scale increases and they get sloppier in how they treat the animals.
I have seen some high quality Finnish documents of animal slaughter and mutilating. I am still ok with the practices that they use and buy meat.
Am I directly supporting child labor if I wear clothes that have been made by children in some poor country?
Am I directly supporting the horrible work environments that humans have in some of the poor countries, where the minerals to make my computers and components are dug out?
We soon find out that I can not use any products or objects, if I dont justify some unethical things involved in producing them.
About antibiotics in domesticated animals. It is American problem yet again, in Finland, we do not feed out animals with antibiotics (except if the animals are sick and really need them). I would be worried about humans use of antibiotics as well. Many people do not eat all the antibiotics that were given to them, or eat antibiotics in situations where you would not need them. This is very common especially in poor countries where people dont understand how antibiotics work, and why they dont work on for example viruses.