shubla wrote:Maybe my thoughts about ships being useless in modern conflicts is true after all.
I'd say ships is the one of most significant power for modern conflicts: judging by moskva warship, it was a kind of giant anti-air umbrella for entire south of Ukraine, not only by it's anti-aircraft missiles, but also radar systems, making it nearly impossible to perform any aerial actions by Ukraine in those regions. Firepower is huge - 16 cruise missiles at barrage. Ukraine war experts said that it's up to be reassessed what kind of breach in aerial defense they have now on south, what can be said for sure is that other ships are not capable of actions on the sea.
Fostik wrote:What I can call useless(judging by what is happening on current war) is tanks, a good equipped armored personnel carrier can achieve same battle efficiency and be safer due to it's speed. The crew can be equipped with anti-air missiles, anti-tank missiles, scouting drones, and even attack drones(like switchblade) and this is still cheaper than tank, which can be destroyed by one shot with equipment that weights 2 to 10 kilograms which costs few thousands dollars comparing to millions of tank price.
shubla wrote:Hopefully it has great anti submarine capabilities as well, because huge firepower and great anti air are of no use in seabed![]()
VDZ wrote:Jalpha wrote:Controlling soldiers is basically impossible. The type who persist within military forces are basically criminals too intelligent to be imprisoned.
Deploying them is like letting a jailhouse population out to play with regular people.
Nobodies military is any different. It's interesting to see Putin stand up for his soldiers. I hope it doesn't send the wrong message to the soldiers. What choice was he given though.
I call bullshit on this one. Militaries are complex social structures designed specifically to keep people in line and having them do exactly as commanded from higher up. A military operation cannot succeed unless the soldiers can be controlled sufficiently. Lacking control of your soldiers means your soldiers are not trained adequately (which seems to be the case for Russia). When this results in war crimes, those responsible for keeping the soldiers in check are also held responsible for their behavior, and rightly so. We can train even animals to maul people only on command, surely it can't be too much asked to do the same for soldiers?
mvgulik wrote:(the sens of impunity always brings out the best(beast) in MAN)
mvgulik wrote:2) Rape has always been a thing in war's. (the sens of impunity always brings out the best(beast) in MAN)
VDZ wrote:I do however share mvgulik's sentiment that the baby rape story smells like made-up outrage bait. I wouldn't accept claims as severe as that without a reliable source.
Users browsing this forum: BLEX [Bot], ChatGPT [Bot], Claude [Bot] and 8 guests