Philosophy is the the study of thought using clearly defined rules and logic. All of math and science is based on philosophical principles. In fact, the rules of logical debate fall under the realm of philosophy, whether you took the course in social sciences, computer science/programming, political studies, or other department. (Just to note, ethics also falls under the study of philosophy... should be obvious, but another one of those you don't take a philosophy class anymore, you take an "ethics in medicine" or "business ethics" class.)
The problem with a lot of modern philosophy is they simply rebrand older works with new names and merging a few details. Rand comes to mind on that. That doesn't mean it isn't good. The upside is a fresh view of the older thoughts that gets people thinking about who they are, their purpose, and how best to live in the world. The downside is that it can become pretentious and self-aggrandizing. Another downside is that it largely gets ignored unless there's an outstanding work published that catches the public eye, such as "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance."
Feynman is popular, largely for his atheist views, I think... but popular doesn't make him right. He was a great physicist. So was Einstein, who also had a lot to say about the way we live in the world. You don't see ravenous fans rallying around Einstein's world views.
arcolithe wrote:if it was logical I'd see a lot more abstract math and set theory arguments.
Applying such things to philosophical debate is like applying the geological makeup of the Earth to how string theory functions. Without the rigors of logic, it is no longer philosophy, but merely religious proselytizing.
Opinions expressed in this statement are the authors alone and in no way reflect on the game development values of the actual developers.