fallout wrote:Burinn wrote:
Please stop.
Great discussion yourself. .
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
fallout wrote:Burinn wrote:
Please stop.
Great discussion yourself. .
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Burinn wrote:
~40% is not slightly off. You got accused of exaggerating and double downed on it. Then proved the accusations correct. It's a million fewer tiles lol.
What a fucking surprise that is. Please use accurate numbers instead of pulling them out of your ass and maybe people won't feel so strongly that you're making things up!
loleznub wrote:Burinn wrote:
~40% is not slightly off. You got accused of exaggerating and double downed on it. Then proved the accusations correct. It's a million fewer tiles lol.
What a fucking surprise that is. Please use accurate numbers instead of pulling them out of your ass and maybe people won't feel so strongly that you're making things up!
Sorry, I didn't know it was this bad that you couldn't find the difference of probability based off the number you set previously (1 in 302,600,000)
2,250,000-1,125,000= 1,125,000
1,125,000/302,600,000 = .0037 (or .37%)
compared to
2,250,000/302,600,000 = .0074 (or .74%)
Such, a difference of ~.4% from the original claim, based off your own saying of what happened to me is the same as me winning the lottery!
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
xdragonlord18 wrote:loleznub wrote:Considering those that were vehemently opposing me have now gone silent after viewing my reply, there you have it folks turns out the experienced player was correct in the end and a sprucecap that was acting high and mighty was indeed wrong.
Lmao can you stop making Burinn look good? Please? They just said that any map you post is going to be easily fabricated. Then you posted a map that is easy to fabricate. I don't know what year you think it is, but it's 2020 and photo editing software has been powerful enough to copy and paste the same icon with different text over and over again on a black background for at least 2 decades.
Burinn wrote:
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Burinn wrote:
Holy fuck you actually don't know what a percentage is.
loleznub wrote:Burinn wrote:
Holy fuck you actually don't know what a percentage is.
I'm not calculating the difference my original claim was off to my own, but rather the difference based on your claim of what was happening was the same as 1/302,600,000 (i.e winning the lottery)
If you can't see this, it's pretty sad.
You're trying to compare me saying I had 2 oranges when in actuality I only had 1.
I'm trying to compare your claim, and the difference in my claim to the realistic one, and that difference is very small.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Burinn wrote:Burinn wrote:
Believe it or not I would believe him if his initial area searched was 40% less than what he originally said.
What a waste of time lmao.
Can you address this please?
If you have no reason to lie, why the fuck did you lie about how much you searched in the first place? Come on dude.
Burinn wrote:
Please address the fact that you lied and have now had us talk about a situation that does not in fact exist for 4 pages.
sabinati wrote:do you expect me to just check the forum constantly, fuck off
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 36 guests