When?

[Ants]

Most powerful faction wants siege to be easy. More at 11.

Siege has been borderline impossible since like world 4 and it's been fine. Sieges in legacy were extremely, extremely rare. I dunno why we're just now acting like this is a new thing. Oh right, it's because it's ADs first time being in a real powerful position and they're just realizing it's always been this way.

There's a difference between hard and impossible. HH and other factions haven't sieged anyone either, it's not just ad AD thing. Yggdrasil tried sieging my old village, this sceenshot was the result:

Untitled.png

I think it's a good illustration of the current siege system.

[SnuggleSnail]

*raises hand*
Hey, hi. I've sieged some people.
I think it's easier than ever to siege intermediate villages who can't have somebody online 24/7.
I also think bypassing archery towers is pretty easy.

[MagicManICT]

*raises hand*
Hey, hi. I've sieged some people.
I think it's easier than ever to siege intermediate villages who can't have somebody online 24/7.
I also think bypassing archery towers is pretty easy.

So let me get this straight...

You've actually used the siege system, think it works fine, and don't hate it? Makes me wonder about all these people that cry about how terrible the changes to siege are....

All I know is... I feel confused now.

[azrid]

Its easy to raid inactive people its hard to raid people who log on daily.

[jorb]

Its easy to raid inactive people its hard to raid people who log on daily.

... as it should be?

[wonder-ass]

Its easy to raid inactive people its hard to raid people who log on daily.

... as it should be?

Yes it should whatever you do dont make it easier

[Tamalak]

Its easy to raid inactive people its hard to raid people who log on daily.

... as it should be?

As it should be, but should hard = impossible? As long as you spam archery towers all is good even if the whole world is united against you no?

[Ozzy123]

Tbh if there were more events like meteorites, just something happening on the map that encourages and most importantly rewards pvp it would make people less siege-hungry, most of people don't really care about necessarily sieging someone, people just want action but fighting for no reason is.. pointless? This game right now seems like some kind of idle-clicker where for a few months you idle(bot) quality and stats and then have some fun pvping people for no reason, this world is probably already doomed but something has to be done for the next one - pvp being more rewarded/encouraged, bots not being necessary to be competetive, some more end-game stuff than dungeons to do.

[MightySheep]

So let me get this straight...

You've actually used the siege system, think it works fine, and don't hate it? Makes me wonder about all these people that cry about how terrible the changes to siege are....

All I know is... I feel confused now.

dno who snugglesnail is but I ask u, how many siege threads you seen in moot this world? oh ya none

compare that to previous worlds, even last world with dumb convoluted system it was still doable

also I agree if pvp had more of a purpose, an actual logical conclusion then siege isnt necessary but right now for the pvp portion of the playerbase there is little long term motivation, even something as simple as a battle ranking could be a very big motivation for ppl (im imagining a tier list like in one punch man "omg its an S-ranked hero!" etc)

[Ozzy123]

dno who snugglesnail is

He's some massive nerd thats literally online 24/7, he's a slave botting pies for troll and bunsey, he probably raided some empty palisades cuz he had the autism to stay there without logging off for 30 hours straight.