NOOBY93 wrote:Ah, the strawman. If you can't respond with an actual argument, just stop talking.
That is literally what you just said. You expect that causing emotional distress in someone makes them less likely to cause emotional distress in others. It displays your attempted claim to the moral high ground.
I disagree with your philosophy. I think that causing negativity in the life of another in an attempt to force them to accept your interpretation of what is "right and wrong" is ineffective, inefficient and just generally the wrong way to go about things. I think it's a much better option to use logic, reason and compassion in an attempt to have another consider your viewpoint.
Again I reiterate that what you said displays a claim to a morally superior high ground, that you are superior to others and that if they don't believe what you believe then they need to be punished for it. That's not very nice is it?