Bowshot125 wrote:Now its only fair to rez drowned players right?
but is it fair that some got rezd and not others?
Bowshot125 wrote:Now its only fair to rez drowned players right?
Apillion wrote:jorb wrote:Yes.
No.
No, that is not accurate. We have not revived any characters this world, and nor do we intend to.
you have revived someone that is in my village.. He drowned from server rolling him back into deep water after crashing from a bug he was in deep water and drowned
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=40483
Please i have spent many hours on this character and its pretty crap to lose it to a bug that is no fault of my own
Apillion wrote:but is it fair that some got rezd and not others?
Hasta wrote:Trouble in the paradise... >.>
jorb wrote:Apillion wrote:but is it fair that some got rezd and not others?
Nope. Not at all, actually. If anything I guess loftar felt himself personally responsible for the death in question, but, regardless, I do not agree with the decision.
jorb wrote:You already find it unfair that we (apparently) revived some and not all, and yet you want us to revive you? Do you not see the problem? We might as well remove death entirely if all it takes is a PM claiming you died from a bug to get you resurrected.
jorb wrote:You already find it unfair that we (apparently) revived some and not all, and yet you want us to revive you? Do you not see the problem? We might as well remove death entirely if all it takes is a PM claiming you died from a bug to get you resurrected.
RickyP602 wrote:jorb wrote:You already find it unfair that we (apparently) revived some and not all, and yet you want us to revive you? Do you not see the problem? We might as well remove death entirely if all it takes is a PM claiming you died from a bug to get you resurrected.
I do see the problem, makes total sense. However, in Loftar's case, if he was working on the server and knew he killed a bunch of people, I don't see the problem with that.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 17 guests