omg you people. All a claim means conceptually is that someone has set up a watch on that area and can track people who go into it or do things in it.
"Tresspassing" on a claim is not an evil, anti-carebear action. All it means is you leave a scent. It shouldn't really be called a criminal action.
IMO keep the change, there is nothing wrong with claiming water.
Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
13 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
by Tamalak » Thu Feb 25, 2016 6:13 pm
- Tamalak
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:31 am
Re: Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
by Amanda44 » Thu Feb 25, 2016 6:17 pm
No-one is saying not to claim water - just to go back to not leaving scents when crossing it in a boat, which is the way it has always been, any scent can be used for tracking which includes the lowly trespass scent.
Also ... OMG you ppl!
Also ... OMG you ppl!
Koru wrote:
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
It is like in Lord of the Flies, nobody controlls what is going on in the hearthlands, those weaker and with conscience are just fucked.
Avatar made by Jordan.
Animal lovers - Show us your pets! - viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44444#p577254
-
Amanda44 - Posts: 6491
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Can't pass River if personal claim on it?
by boreial » Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:19 am
just saying thanks to jorb, for considering changing it back to no trespass in a boat when crossing a claim while on water.
-
boreial - Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:02 am
- Location: Smack dab in the middle of NoWhere
13 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot], Semrush [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 0 guests
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group