Inactive claims should be possible to defend

[jock]

Rage = cheap
Theft = Expensive
Vandalism = Very expensive

Hard agree. However, very unlikely to be considered by Jorb because cheap rage = pvp = noobs killed = noobs leave the game and never come back. At least I think this is the justification behind him making rage even more expensive and not touching combat balance even slightly.

so.... basically how it is already... i don't see how this change would make it worse.


Honestly, they should remove rage; will to power is enough.

[LeeroyJenkns]

so.... basically how it is already... i don't see how this change would make it worse.

It won't, but it will seem to the devs as if they're adding more PvP into the mix, and that's bad apparently (hence the rage price increase). This is why this thread is more of a bargain rather than a blunt suggestion because if it was just that, it would instantly be ignored by them jorb won't read this anyway.