Fostik wrote:Ask zebra if it thinks lions hunting them is a good for evolution and food chain.
If a lion needed a document allowing it to eat a zebra, it would be bad for evolution.
Fostik wrote:We are not discussing how personal and village claims or permissions work, nor there's a discussion about visitor debuff or criminal acts. You can't enter someone's else claim or open gates if you're not added to claim or village either way. You can't cut trees or mine minerals or alter any resources without criminal acts if they're claimed.
If you still want to keep raising this topic, read
viewtopic.php?f=40&t=44710, and raise your own thread suggesting how would you see mutually exclusive actions dilemma solved.
Otherwise you are just trying to hijack the topic bringing unrelated stuff related to additional game permissions which were not suggested, what was suggested is token implementation of permissions granted to you in villages you don't belong to, to build complex relations and perhaps building serfdom for hermits around you.
I read it. It was interesting.
"In so doing, it would be an object of abject failure if, along with the beauties and wonders of real life, not also some of the difficulties associated with it were to be emulated.".с.
But some things from real life shouldn't be transferred to the game. I don't want to run around with a stack of documents.
I'm not trying to hijack the topic or change the conversation, I just thought you wanted to make it easier to obtain rights in another village with a document than through personal claims, groups, and so on.
If your goal is to create something like serfdom, with the issuance of corresponding documents, that's a different matter.
I'm simply writing my opinion on your proposal, possible pros, cons, and improvements.
My english is bEd.