by SnuggleSnail » Mon Oct 10, 2022 3:44 pm
Being tedious to interact with, to the point you need be fed a mathematical proof and get it peer reviewed before accepting 1+1=2 does not make you right when nobody is willing to go to the effort.
My simulation method is almost certainly imperfect, but your method does not even consider like 10 different relevant variables. I do not believe that you are dumb enough to look at this spade and not be able to recognize it is a spade.
Either way, the fact this argument exists is pretty good proof that I'm right about it being overly complicated. Even if you were right, which you're not, I don't think the average facebook mom who cares about animals wants to do what you've described.
BQ should be yeeted, and tertiary stats should have a positive bias. This would make 1pen/animal type viable, and the quantity of animals necessary for average +18/19 muchhhhh lower.
"We specialize in permadeath and forum drama." -man who removed death and deletes every drama thread
http://www.seatribe.se/