Rebalancing the curiosity system

[molenga]

The main difference people that played legacy haven notice on the current game is probrably the curiosity system, due to how slow paced it is now when compared to w7.

This is mainly due to the removal of the personal belief system, withount the learning ability bonus from the full change and full peacefull personal beliefs and withount the tea buff to learning ability the amount of lp that we receive per curio is restricted only to the curios base lp that is determined by q.

Now, im not saying we should bring the personal belief system back, it caused far more problems then solutions, but maybe the current curiosity system is in need of some rebalancing, like increasing the base lp that each curio currently gives per q level and maybe introducing a new system akin to the learning ability system but less flawed?

[venatorvenator]

I disagree; what we need is some way to block auto curio swap.

[shubla]

I disagree; what we need is some way to block auto curio swap.

Or just resedign current curio system
Theres reason why people made up this sytem "so fast", because current curiosity system just doesnt work.
No, i dont know any better system

[molenga]

I disagree; what we need is some way to block auto curio swap.

Agreed, but that is an entirely different topic.

What do you disagree with, you don´t think we should increase the amount of lp gained for each curio? Im not saying we should make dandelions give 2k lp or something, just a small increase.

[sabinati]

salem inspirational system was probably better tbh

[molenga]

salem inspirational system was probably better tbh

Have not played salem, what is different about it´s system?

[venatorvenator]

I disagree; what we need is some way to block auto curio swap.

Agreed, but that is an entirely different topic.

What do you disagree with, you don´t think we should increase the amount of lp gained for each curio? Im not saying we should make dandelions give 2k lp or something, just a small increase.

No, I don't, it's fine as it is for me. I am actually gaining LP much faster than I did in w7.

It's exactly the same topic because increasing LP yield without somehow changing stuff to block curio bots would exponentially increase the LP gap between subscribing botters and non-botters, or non-subs.

[molenga]

I disagree; what we need is some way to block auto curio swap.

Agreed, but that is an entirely different topic.

What do you disagree with, you don´t think we should increase the amount of lp gained for each curio? Im not saying we should make dandelions give 2k lp or something, just a small increase.

No, I don't, it's fine as it is for me. I am actually gaining LP much faster than I did in w7.

It's exactly the same topic because increasing LP yield without somehow changing stuff to block curio bots would exponentially increase the LP gap between subscribing botters and non-botters, or non-subs.

Bots will always be a problem, but the system as it is now is already favouring botters over non-botters, and quite honestly as it is now being a non-sub player is like not playing the game at all, more like being constant raid-fodder because you can´t play enough to even gather curios, muh less protect your claim from raiders.

[sabinati]

salem inspirational system was probably better tbh

Have not played salem, what is different about it´s system?

it is based on resource consumption rather than simple login and swap curios at certain time.

instant study an inspirational. it drains your black bile, which regens by consuming certain food.
studying same inspirational multiple times had diminishing returns until you bought/leveled a skill, spending the inspiration points.

similar system could be implemented here with some tweaking.

[Hervarth]

salem inspirational system was probably better tbh

I would agree with that probably.

I don't really see the problem with lp gain being slower globally. Why are people so attached to large numbers?
It makes it harder to play solo without alts, because you maybe dont gain enough lp to not softcap everything, but I'm ok with that if it encourages people to cooperate a bit more.