Stockpile for empty produce sacks

[Jorg]

A stockpile to pile up empty produce sacks. probably inferior to most containers since empty sacks stack, but just a handy way to move things around

[serVar161]

Bag for bags, sack for sack.
Can sacks be stored in a garden shed? Since they are both inventory items and objects, you could, in theory, fit a lot of bags in there. I'll have to check.
But even a regular closet can hold 16(or more?) sacks - is that not enough? How many sacks do you want to fit in the sack stockpile?

[Jorg]

Bag for bags, sack for sack.
Can sacks be stored in a garden shed? Since they are both inventory items and objects, you could, in theory, fit a lot of bags in there. I'll have to check.
But even a regular closet can hold 16(or more?) sacks - is that not enough? How many sacks do you want to fit in the sack stockpile?

I don't want more storage for them, i just want to have the convenience of right clicking a random square to store them. I don't think any of the stockpiles exceed metal cupboards(except maybe leaves and straw)

[serVar161]

I don't want more storage for them, i just want to have the convenience of right clicking a random square to store them. I don't think any of the stockpiles exceed metal cupboards(except maybe leaves and straw)

Got it. You want to be able to make piles out of bags, like you would with stones, bones, etc.
I don't remember what happens now if you press the right mouse button with an empty bag and hit the ground.

[mvgulik]

Sack items stack per 3.
Single sack item can also be stored in pocked equipment slots, one sack in each pocket slot.

Stockpiling empty sack objects don't makes any sense. (And is mutual exclusive of directly dumping stuff in an empty sack object)
For a simple reason ... heartlings can only use one sack object at a time anyway.

Best empty sack object usage is placing them in the locations where you regularly use one. (or use some smaller(hitbox) container to store them as items at those locations)
And when regularly moving stuff with multiple sack's from A to B ... stored them as objects in a dedicated sack cart.

[vatas]

ESL levels on this thread are way too high, I doubt the conversation is actually connecting. Nobody knows what other people are actually saying, and are responding to misconstrued ideas that have little to nothing to do with what was attempted to communicate.

Hope I don't come of as too mean, but one person on this thread has openly admitted that his forum posts go through Google Translate.

[Regulus2424]

ESL levels on this thread are way too high, I doubt the conversation is actually connecting. Nobody knows what other people are actually saying, and are responding to misconstrued ideas that have little to nothing to do with what was attempted to communicate.

Hope I don't come of as too mean, but one person on this thread has openly admitted that his forum posts go through Google Translate.

*gasps*

[serVar161]

ESL levels on this thread are way too high, I doubt the conversation is actually connecting. Nobody knows what other people are actually saying, and are responding to misconstrued ideas that have little to nothing to do with what was attempted to communicate.

Hope I don't come of as too mean, but one person on this thread has openly admitted that his forum posts go through Google Translate.

That was really rude! Now everyone knows it, but I tried to hide it. That's why I even signed it "My English bEed." I didn't expect that from you.
Yes, that's a problem, but what can we do? We communicate as best we can and hope someone understands what we mean. We shouldn't learn English just for that.
What about the idea suggested in this thread?

[Regulus2424]

Do not worry, I doubt anyone here thought that you were capable of learning English in the first place, much less that you should have.