overtyped wrote:...
"Bob is very intelligent in other ways, but understanding the nuances of conversation and inference aren't one of those ways."
overtyped wrote:...
overtyped wrote:That's bullshit. He was a friend, and there's a thing called past experience. If something can be taken two ways, you use your past experiences with that person to figure out what they mean.
Before that message, i was talking about trading animals with him, but he obviously never saw me as a friend, so he ultimately decided he was gonna interpret things in the most negative possible fucking light. That aint on me
Austinh15 wrote:overtyped wrote:That's bullshit. He was a friend, and there's a thing called past experience. If something can be taken two ways, you use your past experiences with that person to figure out what they mean.
Before that message, i was talking about trading animals with him, but he obviously never saw me as a friend, so he ultimately decided he was gonna interpret things in the most negative possible fucking light. That aint on me
Sure, it might not be on you, but it doesn't change how he took it. There's nothing you can really do to fix that. I won't claim to understand the inner workings of your personal relationships, I'm just saying you have no control over how he took it, and as such it doesn't matter what you meant by your statement. I'm also not going to speak for nightdawg. Either way, if you didn't mean it that way, sorry your friendship fell apart. If what you're saying is true, then neither side is right and this is a personal matter made public.
jorb wrote:I dub you Sir Pills of the Mighty Spruce.
Thank you for your service. :pray:
Pills wrote:I'm curious where the name is pulled from as our client isn't in the list. Though maybe its the one with no name, we do have a different build.xml to default afterall, most people probably don't bother touching that
Nightdawg wrote:Pills wrote:I'm curious where the name is pulled from as our client isn't in the list. Though maybe its the one with no name, we do have a different build.xml to default afterall, most people probably don't bother touching that
in
Config.java
on this line:
public static final String confid = jarprops.getProperty("config.client-id", "unknown");
you change this string to what you want the client to be identified as.
jorb wrote:I dub you Sir Pills of the Mighty Spruce.
Thank you for your service. :pray:
loftar wrote:I finally got around to start collecting statistics on custom-client use. There's a page up over here.
Keep in mind that the custom-client "IDs" are self-reported, including the "unknown" ID, which is the default if the author hasn't set anything. The empty ID is an older default. The "hour-of-day" graph is UTC-based, so the edges correspond to UTC midnight. Once more data has been collected (this should be on Friday), I'll add daily use and day-of-week use graphs as well.
Cue all the jokes about default client usage!
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 82 guests