sabinati wrote:but now, the legitimate owners of the stalls would as well, correct?
Nope. :)
sabinati wrote:but now, the legitimate owners of the stalls would as well, correct?
loftar wrote:I actually intervened and removed the village. I'm not sure if I should have done it, but it was such obvious griefing anyway.
This mode of griefing will have to be dealt with, of course. Probably via village warfare and probably some other mechanism.
Cain wrote:loftar wrote:I actually intervened and removed the village. I'm not sure if I should have done it, but it was such obvious griefing anyway.
This mode of griefing will have to be dealt with, of course. Probably via village warfare and probably some other mechanism.
While obviously you shouldn't have to (or be able to) police the hearthlands, since we can't currently do anything to get rid of an offending village your intervention is necessary and greatly appreciated.
In my view, griefing is the worst offense possible, as there is no motive other than inflicting pain/damage on others.
Potjeh wrote:They couldn't have done it. Destroying stalls destroys the goods in them. Taking from them leaves theft, even if you remove the claims.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 6 guests