Zampfeo wrote:The social ostracization is targeted towards the 20 year old by their own, older peers. As a 15 year old, you wouldn't be privy to it.
Vraatjuh wrote:But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
Shitten_DuPants wrote:Vraatjuh wrote:But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
I mean, maybe you’d be surprised at how many of the people who are disgusted by misa’s pedophilia also dislike all that stuff and are just less vocal because of how this community has been built. People who maybe assumed that actual, real-life molestation of minors would arouse ire even among the “edgelords”
Because shit flows downhill.
If you want to talk about who’s been normalizing what in this community you should maybe start with those with the most power to decide such things.
Vraatjuh wrote:Yes, I would still be asking these questions. Because my point is not about wether he is wrong or not by our (and my) moral standards, because he obviously is both for 7 and 15 years old. But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
Luno wrote:Vraatjuh wrote:Yes, I would still be asking these questions. Because my point is not about wether he is wrong or not by our (and my) moral standards, because he obviously is both for 7 and 15 years old. But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING aBOUT
Vraatjuh wrote:Shitten_DuPants wrote:Vraatjuh wrote:But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
I mean, maybe you’d be surprised at how many of the people who are disgusted by misa’s pedophilia also dislike all that stuff and are just less vocal because of how this community has been built. People who maybe assumed that actual, real-life molestation of minors would arouse ire even among the “edgelords”
Because shit flows downhill.
If you want to talk about who’s been normalizing what in this community you should maybe start with those with the most power to decide such things.
But this is not about them. We all know they won't do much on any case and are partially questionable as well here and there, and because they think we should be a self-solving entity. So it is either us community who make this place a slightly less edgy place, or we accept how it is now depending how much of a lost case we all think this is.
I know some of you think of the Haven community as a very nice community within your own bubble (not targetting you specifically), but boy can it be toxic for anyone outside that little bubble.
Vraatjuh wrote:Vraatjuh wrote: But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
Sorry, I don't know if you expect a certain reply on this? What was not clear in my answering? Would you like me to write it out in caps for visibility?
PROPOSED COMMUNITY NOTE: This purposed "fact" is based on Discord and forum messages that can be feasibly dismissed as distasteful edgy jokes. No evidence beyond screenshots of that nature has ever been provided.
Obviously, this does not proof that he is NOT a pedophile, but...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_a_negative
Vraatjuh wrote:Why stop with this case?
TheServant wrote:These people harassed me for months even before, this has nothing to do about moral concern. They have many pedo jokes in their client, a lot of racist shit and all edgy stuff in their discord, thats why we dont bother trying to argue anything cause theyre here for the lulz. Nobody that would care about this regard would act like this. Rawrz discord banned me and prohibit italking about it, which would be the only sane response if one really had any concern. These trolls couldnt control themselves and made another discord over this. Theres doxxing talk, racism and lots of shit over there. They even made memes with "Misa and 14yo novinha" and a cavehole. Its funny cause many of them would be arrested irl over the shit they do there.
Vraatjuh wrote:But about the insane amount of hypocrisy involving this case. If we are so involved in this community and wanting to make it a safer space. Why stop with this case? Why have we normalized so much of the other stuff in the past.
Users browsing this forum: Claude [Bot] and 0 guests