vatas wrote:Honestly that is "hate the game not the player" -moment. (Charter stones functioning with such an open system that allows hijacking inactive names.)
Also WB should've spammed "PSA: do not use "bay" charter stone." They only updated their OP 24 or so hours ago. They should be at least partially blamed for every loss people took when travelling to the "Real Fake Bay."
Cajoes wrote:Victim blaming. Cute.
Cajoes wrote:vatas wrote:Honestly that is "hate the game not the player" -moment. (Charter stones functioning with such an open system that allows hijacking inactive names.)
Also WB should've spammed "PSA: do not use "bay" charter stone." They only updated their OP 24 or so hours ago. They should be at least partially blamed for every loss people took when travelling to the "Real Fake Bay."
Victim blaming. Cute.
vatas wrote:Cajoes wrote:vatas wrote:Honestly that is "hate the game not the player" -moment. (Charter stones functioning with such an open system that allows hijacking inactive names.)
Also WB should've spammed "PSA: do not use "bay" charter stone." They only updated their OP 24 or so hours ago. They should be at least partially blamed for every loss people took when travelling to the "Real Fake Bay."
Victim blaming. Cute.
I'm assuming that retort is targeted at my criticism of WB.
Let's imagine that I'm your neighbour and ignore fire breaking out in my residence. Fire ends up burning your residence down as well while I continue to do nothing. When you ask why I didn't simply call the local 911 equivalent to at least mitigate the damage, I call you out for victim blaming.
Charter Stones cost only one Rock Crystals now. Why not build an "answering machine" vclaim somewhere that can hold the correct name? Have something paved inside the vclaim to explain that this is a "redirect" from the real market because market Charter Stone had to be deactivated.
Cajoes wrote:Okay, but consider this. Your analogy makes no sense. Authority only exists at the tip of the sword in Hafen and the fire didn't start by itself, it was instigated. You are in essence, blaming the home-owner, whose house is burning down, that he should've forwarded his mail adress, instead of having UPS throw his packages into the blaze. Because some ass set his house on fire without warning while attempting to break inside. I am dimly aware what you are attempting to get at, but you are still absolving the responsible parties of blame by critiquing WB's handling of the out of context situation they are currently facing with a poorly structured analogy.
Cajoes wrote:Okay, but consider this. Your analogy makes no sense. Authority only exists at the tip of the sword in Hafen and the fire didn't start by itself, it was instigated. You are in essence, blaming the home-owner, whose house is burning down, that he should've forwarded his mail adress, instead of having UPS throw his packages into the blaze. Because some ass set his house on fire without warning while attempting to break inside. I am dimly aware what you are attempting to get at, but you are still absolving the responsible parties of blame by critiquing WB's handling of the out of context situation they are currently facing with a poorly structured analogy.
Cajoes wrote:Okay, but consider this. Your analogy makes no sense. Authority only exists at the tip of the sword in Hafen and the fire didn't start by itself, it was instigated. You are in essence, blaming the home-owner, whose house is burning down, that he should've forwarded his mail adress, instead of having UPS throw his packages into the blaze. Because some ass set his house on fire without warning while attempting to break inside. I am dimly aware what you are attempting to get at, but you are still absolving the responsible parties of blame by critiquing WB's handling of the out of context situation they are currently facing with a poorly structured analogy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest