Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
bmjclark wrote:As much as most of the post with shield bash didnt make much sense, it would be nice to have a free move as melee to bring it inline with unarmed more. Maybe shield bash could do half weight or something so its weaker then punch?
DeadlyPencil wrote:bmjclark wrote:As much as most of the post with shield bash didnt make much sense, it would be nice to have a free move as melee to bring it inline with unarmed more. Maybe shield bash could do half weight or something so its weaker then punch?
it will make sense to people who know how the combat system, maybe you should refrain from posting on balance issues until you know how the game works.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
DeadlyPencil wrote:oh? and you think less people going UA is a bad thing? its more realistic that way. and your planning on giving up your travelers sacks and ability to use ranged weapons in a fight i assume.
What I suggested wont change the fact that swords do no penatration damage which is basically my biggest issue with melee. i have used a sword in a fight a couple times and done 0 damage to a guy because he managed to get a little bit of defence before i hit. thats very dangerous... especailly if i spend all my INIT on something like a valerious strike thinking its going to KO the guy and i end up doing 0 damage because he turned on oak stance and got a little bit of defence.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
bmjclark wrote:I dont think less going UA is a bad thing, i think no one going UA would be though. Both should be equal. Yes, no penetration is kind of scary if they have good gear. But its not enough justification to buff melee as much as ur original post suggested
Radenk wrote:bmjclark wrote:I dont think less going UA is a bad thing, i think no one going UA would be though. Both should be equal. Yes, no penetration is kind of scary if they have good gear. But its not enough justification to buff melee as much as ur original post suggested
Well, almost nobody goes MC right now and I don't see people complaining.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests