
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
cobaltjones wrote:My only problem with a palisade is that it's a bitch to destroy if you ever decide to expand your claim or move stuff around. I know people say "well just build your palisade 3x of the actual space you're using!" but that's annoying in that you end up using extra resources and your actual settlement looks strange with walls so far out, not to mention you'd have to worry about decay if it's outside of your claimed land.
I'm mostly a hermit and my main enjoyment in this game is simply making up my own little claim and organizing everything and basically just designing the layout of where I live and do my work. I hate to think of putting up a palisade because it just seems so "final" and kind of hampers my ability to redesign and expand things if I want to.
I realize that my playing habits are pretty atypical, but it would be nice to have something that at least afforded some protection without being basically set in stone like a palisade wall. The option to quickly destroy anything on your own claim would be really nice, however unrealistic so I don't expect that to happen. Even just the change of making a roundpole gate require vandalism to open would be enough to keep me happy for a little while. Something that doesn't make my area look like free pickings to everyone that walks by. I understand that if people want to steal from me that they're going to, especially if I have such low defenses, but some sort of middle ground would be nice as well.
jgudge wrote:I like this idea a lot.
I only have one question. As it stands, palisades and brickwalls require two cornerposts to make a gate, which is a fairly expensive investment for a mid-ranged player. Since this means that you'd be able to much more easily destroy wall segments, wouldn't the cost of investment on a palisade/brickwall be halved, considering you can knock out 3 sections, plop down another cornerpost for 50 brick and 5 wrought (as opposed to 300 brick and 10 wrought) and build a gate? This wouldn't apply to people planning on building a village with a solid wall and no gate obviously, but wouldn't this encourage a huge increase in bw's?
Grable wrote:TeckXKnight wrote:Yes, this would mean building gates would be cheaper.grable wrote:The idea is great but I see a big flaw:
What if someone builds a huge walled area and certain parts aren't claimed (yet)? This means raiders can just build a private claim there and bash the pali/brickwall in no time.
Is this even a flaw? You didn't own that land or wall anyway. You own land and force others to use criminal acts once your personal or village claim extend over a tile. Before that, that's just another wall segment waiting to decay.
The problem is you would need to claim the whole (huge) area before you even start building a brickwall... and claiming a huge area takes time. I always built brickwall for defense first, then claimed the parts that weren't claimed yet.
TheTylerLee wrote:its possible to abuse this
cobaltjones wrote:I have no problem with the materials requirement, I just wish it were easier to destroy things that you've built on your own property
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests