Lp debate

Thoughts on the further development of Haven & Hearth? Feel free to opine!

Lp debate

Postby inventer110 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:33 am

Why cant we have normal LP gain as well as curiosities? instead of the endless debates over which is better?'

just an idea.

i am suggesting this thread as a debate towards achieving or dismissing the above goal.

User was warned for this post.
Last edited by Onionfighter on Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: http://www.havenandhearth.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=13216#p195741
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Postby bmjclark » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:35 am

Cause bots are bad.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
User avatar
bmjclark
 
Posts: 4010
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Lp debate

Postby inventer110 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:37 am

bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.



And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.

i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.
Last edited by inventer110 on Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Postby TeckXKnight » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:37 am

What debate? So far it's one side going "MY EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE IS MORE RIGHT THAN YOURS!" and the other side saying "THIS EXACT SAME RETARDED POST HAS BEEN MADE A THOUSAND TIMES BEFORE WHY ARE YOU POSTING IT AGAIN?" I'm not even trying to discourage you here this is just what every single thread breaks down to. There has never been a good argument for why you should bring back LP via actions. I don't care if you're eloquent or not just bring facts to the table rather than nothing at all.

tl;dr lol wut debate?
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Re: Lp debate

Postby bmjclark » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:39 am

inventer110 wrote:
bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.



And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.

i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.


At least they would get killed by people on mindless killing sprees such as myself. You can't sit in ur town and dig up bluebells
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
User avatar
bmjclark
 
Posts: 4010
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Lp debate

Postby inventer110 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:39 am

TeckXKnight wrote:What debate? So far it's one side going "MY EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE IS MORE RIGHT THAN YOURS!" and the other side saying "THIS EXACT SAME RETARDED POST HAS BEEN MADE A THOUSAND TIMES BEFORE WHY ARE YOU POSTING IT AGAIN?" I'm not even trying to discourage you here this is just what every single thread breaks down to. There has never been a good argument for why you should bring back LP via actions. I don't care if you're eloquent or not just bring facts to the table rather than nothing at all.

tl;dr lol wut debate?



If you don't wish for healthy debate it wont cause me any harm, its your choice.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Postby inventer110 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:40 am

bmjclark wrote:
inventer110 wrote:
bmjclark wrote:Cause bots are bad.



And you can't have a bot to collect curiosities?
I could write a program to search them out in a matter of days.

i am just saying that bots are inevitable and not a good reason for dismissal.


At least they would get killed by people on mindless killing sprees such as myself. You can't sit in ur town and dig up bluebells


people in villages can be killed it just takes a little more effort.

and whats to stop someone from writing a combat macro to counter act killing?
Last edited by inventer110 on Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Postby bmjclark » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:41 am

If by a little more effort you mean an uphill battle with a broken impossible to ram a town siege system then i agree with you.
Cajoes wrote:I was the murder victim your guy aggro'd. And slew. Entirely unprovoked. Rather handily at that. Which prompted the retaliatory party. That you also handily slew.
User avatar
bmjclark
 
Posts: 4010
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 6:40 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Lp debate

Postby inventer110 » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:41 am

bmjclark wrote:If by a little more effort you mean an uphill battle with a broken impossible to ram a town siege system then i agree with you.


if i am correct you can shoot over walls right? or did they remove that ability.
"Absolute Power Corrupts, Absolutely."
inventer110
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:06 am

Re: Lp debate

Postby TeckXKnight » Sun Dec 18, 2011 10:42 am

inventer110 wrote:people in villages can be killed it just takes a little more effort.
and whats to stop someone from writing a combat macro to counter act killing?

That's not a fair comparison to make. That's like saying it's as simple to build a hermitage as it is to build a global trade hub.
User avatar
TeckXKnight
 
Posts: 8274
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:31 am
Location: How Do I?

Next

Return to Critique & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests