Anon9k wrote:If you want to follow that road, let's imagine a simple real-life case:
Person A has a friend, Person B. Both of them don't know person C
Person C impersonates person B and gets something from person A, who thinks he is giving it to person B.
Would the court say that it's not an act of stealing? Most likely no, it will be considered a fraud in order to get access over person A belongings under the false name.
That's what actually you did: you were trying to fraud someone to get access to someone else's account.
It's not technically an act of stealing, but fraud is not better than it anyway.
Just saying.
While I see where you are going with your example I don't feel it holds water very well at least for this scenario. The difference being he wasn't impersonating someone that they all knew and trusted, he made up a character all on his own and attempted to rise through the ranks which in my mind is quite different.