I'm taken aback by your analysis.
V, it is an understatement to say you have knack for misreading.
LadyV wrote:You merely hijacked the topics for your own devise.
You're chatting like I've been plotting to take over the world.
If I wanted to assert myself in the way you think, then I would make characters to shit on palisades and yoloswag shit day-in-day-out.
I am baffled you think this: that
LadyV wrote:the friendly competitive spirit of this game
is somehow contrary to any project I have participated or submitted.
I don't know my intents any more than you. I delve into fun when if feels right, and being able to follow a community, in which I can be happy, feels right.
I revealed in
Part 2 that I thought Dis would be that group for me, but there was virtually no transparency for outsiders and no invitation to others beyond being combat ready. Virtually every "Faction" you speak of is only interested in combat readiness. You say I am out to make conflict. Conflict already exists. I will, for the sake of The Edelreich, appeal to conflict. Brodgar was not for me because it shat on security. Groups like The Edelreich need people who are combat savvy, but that is not all that our group is interested in.
I want a faction interested in major works, grand projects, causes, and inspiration. Lol. What is most funny is I don't want to lead. I am pushed to make and sustain The Edelreich because
no group like it exists. Every group is cloistered to a fault or throws caution to the wind. Is there no middle ground?
I am glad you push me to explain myself and defend myself, but LadyV, your conclusions are unfounded.