shubla wrote:Its like H&H but without stubborn devs
yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhh booooiiii
At least it sounds like it, not gonna set myself up for disappointment by having any faith before I see the actual result, but I really wish it'll be like that.
shubla wrote:Of course, there is a backside for all this, lots of investors and such, how long will it take until it becomes just another microtransaction catastrophe or just in general boring game with not much to do/unique mechanics in it.
Maybe they do the sensible thing and only add some cosmetics and possibly subscription at the most, but time will tell.
Man this would be the perfect world, imagine a game that doesn't have obnoxious tedium and mandatory botting-requiring mechanics and devs saying "WE tRy TO TAKE BotTInG aS a SigN of a BrOkEn GAmE MECHAnic, RaTheR THaN aS A SiGN of BrokEN pLAyerS" while actively increasing the tedium in the game mechanics to encourage botting.
shubla wrote:But devs could take some lessons, especially the 2, 3 first ones.
That would be really dope.